Piers Morgan in Tweet
Moeen Ali is a perfect example of the many decent, talented muslims who make England a better place. Great seeing him in an England shirt.
SEE http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/video_audio/755351.html1,844 Retweets
Piers Morgan in Tweet
Moeen Ali is a perfect example of the many decent, talented muslims who make England a better place. Great seeing him in an England shirt.
SEE http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/video_audio/755351.html1,844 Retweets
Filed under cricket for amity, cultural transmission, tolerance
Michael Roberts
Adele Balasingham and a LTTE fighter — BBC, 1991
Apropos of the misleading interpretations of suicide attacks by Western commentators such as the political scientist, Robert Pape, it is important to note that the act of suicide was initially adopted by the LTTE as a defensive tool to protect the organisation from the leaking of information after capture. It was also a mark of their dedication to the Tamil liberation cause and thus a method of drawing popular admiration. It was not till 5 July 1987 that it was deployed as a low cost precision weapon when Miller (a nom de guerre) drove a truck bomb into an SL Army encampment at Nelliyadi. This was but one instance of uyirayutham — life as weapon.
As training was formalised, like all armies the LTTE had a passing out ceremony for their fighters. The induction of a batch of female fighters is graphically depicted in a BBC documentary filmed in the LTTE territories in 1991 where one sees/hears them chant in unison in response to their female commander’s initial prompt:
“Our revolutionary organisation’s purified aim
is for a free society to achieve Tamil Eelam
My life and soul and all this I sacrifice to
our organisation’s leader, our brother, Mr Prabhakaran
We fully accept that for him we will be very faithful and trustworthy
The aim of the Tigers – Tamils’ freedom.” Continue reading
Chris Kenny, in The Weekend Australian, 21 June 2014, where the title is “The diabolical struggle all modern nations face at home and abroad” … with the editorial alteration highlighting the self-serving certitude that the “international community” resides within the Atlantic States of the north
EVERYONE has an opinion on Iraq, but no one has a solution. And in the end only the Iraqi people can own a solution, although after all the meddling the West ought to help. Yet the same rationale that drove the Iraq war from 2003 (and less obliquely the Afghanistan war from 2001) provides the West’s self-interest in finding a settlement now — that mortal danger can be exported abroad from a failed or terrorist state. This is part of the reason the scheduled exit of international troops from Afghanistan is such a worry, why Syria is so troubling, and why we should focus more intently on Somalia, Sudan, Nigeria and a host of other countries where extremists are determined to thwart progress.
If we were without heart or empathy, we might be able to ignore the slaughter of innocents in these countries. But, as 9/11 and a series of other attacks have taught us, from Bali to Boston, Madrid to Moscow and Lagos to London, the extremists will hurt us and our interests so long as they have a base from which to operate. Continue reading
Filed under accountability, Afghanistan, american imperialism, arab regimes, British imperialism, centre-periphery relations, fundamentalism, governance, jihad, military strategy, nationalism, politIcal discourse, power politics, terrorism, the imaginary and the real, truth as casualty of war, world events & processes, zealotry
Greg Sheridan, in The Weekend Australian, 21 June 2012, where the title is “Danger lies in tribal loyalties”
SO President Barack Obama will send 300 US military advisers into Iraq after all. Is this the start of something bigger, as military advisers so often are? Probably not, given Obama’s determination to get out of Iraq and his promise that there will be no US troops involved fighting on the ground. Is it then a shrewd way of maintaining US influence in Iraq and bolstering the feeble Iraqi army? Or is it a lowest common denominator political compromise, seeking to get the symbolism of US power to do the work that the substance of US power once did? Continue reading