Through the unforeseen consequences of missionary work, and through the deliberate activism of Western theosophists such as Col. Olcott, Buddhism revived in Sri Lanka so that today it is the state religion; politicians from traditionally Christian families such as the Bandaranaikes and the Wickremesinghes converted to Buddhism for political expediency, and the government some years ago was sponsoring a bill intended to make it illegal for an individual to change their religion. Within this context the Panadura Controversy stands as a seminal moment. The specific reasons for the debate in Panadura in 1873 were the publications by Revd Daniel Gogerly and a series of sermons denouncing Buddhism preached by Revd David de Silva in Panadura in the Methodist Church. The Venerable Migettuwatte Gunananda Thero, a robust spokesman for Buddhism, with the support of other scholar-monks such as Weligama Sri Sumangala (of Rankoth Viharaya, Panadura) and Hikkaduwe Sri Sumangala, took exception to the sermons and challenged de Silva to defend his remarks. To prove the authenticity and superiority of Christianity, a series of disputations was held to settle the ‘contest’ between Buddhism and Christianity.
‘Before an almost breathless audience, numbering at times from five to seven thousand in attendance,’ the debate lasted two full days. The Buddhist champion, the Venerable Migettuwatte Gunanandada Theroengaged in five oratorical jousts over a period of several years, of which Panadura was the final. Born, Wanigamuni Miguel Mendes Wimalarathna, received his early education at the Sri Subhadrarama Viharaya, Balapitiya, was subsequently admitted to Wesley College, where he, it is said, learnt Christianity and English. At one point he had contemplated on becoming a Christian priest, but got himself ordained again at the Kumara Maha Viharaya, Dodanduwa. The two days at Panadura involved a series of sermons from the Venerable Migettuwatte Gunananda Thero and Revd David de Silva, a Ceylonese Methodist minister, preached in a temporary Cadjan roofed structure. By this time de Silva had been a minister for thirty-three years and had been a close associate of the missionary Daniel Gogerly, a noted Pali scholar who worked in Ceylon from 1818 to 1862. The Buddhist party of approximately two hundred priests occupied one half of a large bungalow whilst the Christian group of several dozen Methodist, Baptist and Anglican clergy occupied the other half. Fourteen police officers and a mounted Inspector were on hand to supervise proceedings, and Mudaliyar Susew de Soysa and Hunupola Nilame were some of the chief-guests that attended. After setting out their positions each attempted to refute the arguments of the other in one-hour long sermons from 8-10am, resuming again from 3-5pm. De Silva spoke first allowing Migettuwatte to speak last. According to the Buddhist record de Silva, a Pali and Sanskrit scholar, spoke with eloquence but at such a level that few in the crowd could understand his sermons. Migettuwatte more populist approach appeared to have a greater impact on the crowd. After each had spoken twice on the first day, at the start of the second day the Methodists brought on a ‘substitute’ for de Silva. F.S Sirimanne, an Anglican lay evangelist, attempted an approach more appropriate to the crowd present. After Migettuwatte’s response de Silva came on for the last time with Migettuwatte preaching the final sermon. At the conclusion of the Disputation the crowd (overwhelmingly Buddhist), cheered Migettuwatte and Buddhism claimed the victory.
The Methodist account of the incident differs from the Buddhist. WJT Small, the historian of Sri Lankan Methodism recorded, ‘The results of the debate were, from the nature of the case, inconclusive.’ It was conceded that the Buddhists had put the Christians on the defensive but that the Christians had got the opportunity to clearly present the gospel to many thousands of Buddhists. ‘But the net result was very small, except that relations were more strained than ever. The Christian Church continued to grow, but not as a result of the controversy.’ Moscrop and Restarick only indirectly refers to the incident, recording ‘great pitched battles’. Panadura is described as ‘an intensely Buddhistic centre, where opposition has often become persecution, where controversy has often been bitter’. That the Disputation had significance is confirmed in the publication of English translations of the sermons in the Times of Ceylon as the event unfolded, the publication in book form of a full account of the debate and sermons that year, and the subsequent reprinting of this over the next hundred and thirty years. The Panadura Debate 1873 was not an isolated incident. It was the culmination of a series of five disputations, the first two of which were held through printed work. The Wesleyan missionary Small made his own contribution to transforming society when, as principal of Richmond College, Galle he founded the National Association in 1915 as a forum to discuss the emerging nationalist movement. Interestingly, whilst the Methodists were largely teetotalers, the Buddhist side of the Panadura Debate was funded by well-established arrack renters.
It is possible to argue that the single event of Panadura completely changed the social and religious context of Sri Lanka. Not because the event in itself was of ultimate significance but it was a printed account of this disputation that attracted Col Olcott to Buddhism and prompted his travel to Ceylon (Olcott credits his friend Dodanduwe Piyaratne Thero for bringing the printed account to his attention as well as the invitation to visit Ceylon). With his arrival in the island a new phase in the revival of the traditional religion arose’. Col Olcott helped to establish Buddhist schools, modelled on Christian Missionary schools, but with the focus on Buddhism instead, which helped ‘re-found’ Buddhism in Sri Lanka.
There is a further connection, related to this incident, between Wesleyan missionaries and societal transformation through Olcott’s role in the founding of Ananda College, which is currently the largest and most prestigious Buddhist boys’ school in Sri Lanka. Among early principals of Ananda College were western theosophists including an Irishman, CC Moore, who had a fairly unsuccessful period in charge from 1910-1913. The principal who transformed the school into a major Sri Lankan institution impacting the nation was P de Silva Kularatne from 1918-1943. Kularatne had been educated at Richmond College and Wesley College, Colombo, both schools founded and run by Methodist missionaries. The Maradana Methodist Church is situated adjacent to Ananda College. Arthur V Dias, a son of Jeremias Dias (and Selestina Rodrigo), an important patron of the Panadura Debate and the Rankoth Viharaya, became a well-known philanthropist and temperance activist. Leslie Goonewardena, a grandson of Mathias Swaris Goonewardena, the builder of the Methodist Church in Panadura and an organizer of the Debate became a radical independence activist. Dias, Goonewardena, Colvin R. de Silva, Wilmot A. Perera, G. P. Malalasekera, Susantha de Fonseka, Bennet Soysa and Ediriweera Sarachchandra were students of St.John’s college, Panadura.
The Panadura incident ‘needs’ to be read as a symbol of the independence struggle. Western Christians, even if they were fronted by David de Silva, were challenged, engaged with and defeated by Ceylonese Buddhism. At a time when Ceylonese society was unable to challenge the political and military dominance the British held on the island, Buddhism was able to successfully challenge Christianity. Similar encounters were noted in mainland India, between Christianity and Hinduism. The ‘defeat’ of Christianity in this encounter heralded the resurgence of Ceylonese nationalism and eventual independence in 1948, though the latter was more a result owing to factors in mainland India. The Disputation at Panadura is somewhat ongoing in contemporary Sri Lanka. After generations of relatively peaceful co-existence, a fundamentalist Buddhist movement was challenging the right of Christians to evangelise in Sri Lanka, and, in places, to worship. A bill to outlaw conversion was being debated in the Sri Lankan parliament some years ago. That a section of Buddhism, in itself a missionary religion, attempting to outlaw conversion in Sri Lanka is a denial of the right that Migettuwatte exercised in August 1873. Those who do not know their history are destined to repeat its mistakes.
The four documents, kept at the Rankot Viharaya Buddhist temple in Panadura, hold immense historical, cultural, spiritual, and intellectual value. Created against the backdrop of religious discord between Buddhists and Christians in the mid-19th century, they consist of correspondence between the Christian and Buddhist leaders advocating for an open dialogue on doctrinal issues, as well as a transcription of the entire dialogue. This transcription spans 27 and a half pages of handwritten text on paper using ink. The event fostered reconciliation and mutual respect between the two religious communities, though in Panadura, the two sides consisted of inter-related families. The English translations, later made available in Europe and the US, had a significant impact on religious activists and scholars in those countries, contributing to the recognition of Buddhism as an advanced religion.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abhayasundara, P., Controversy at Panadura or Pandura Vadaya, (Colombo: State Printing Corporation, 1990), p. VIII. 2
Small, WJT (ed), A History of the Methodist Church in Ceylon, (Colombo: Wesley Press, 1964), p. 222.
Moscrop, T. & Restarick, A.E., Ceylon and its Methodism, (London: Robert Culley, undated), p. 85. Ibid., p. 62-4
Young, R.F & Jebanesan, S., The Bible Trembled: The Hindu-Christian Controversies of Nineteenth Century Ceylon, (Vienna: De Nobili Research Library, 1995)
Young, R.F & Somaratna, G.P.V., Vain Debates: The Buddhist-Christian Controversies of Nineteenth Century Ceylon, (Vienna: De Nobili Research Library, 1996)