Category Archives: NGOs

India, Sri Lanka and the UNHRC

N. Sathiya Moorthy, Courtesy of the Observer Research Foundation,  www.orfonline.org 12 March 2012**

”The Centre will consider the prevailing situation in Sri Lanka and the overall relationship between India and its island-neighbour while formulating its stand on the US-backed resolution against Sri Lanka in the UNHRC,” The Hindu quoted External Affairs Minister S M Krishna as telling newsmen at the Chennai Airport, en route to Singapore. In this context, the newspaper had this to add on what Krishna said in this regard: ”The Centre will take into account the overall relationship between India and Sri Lanka while deciding whether or not to back the resolution when it comes up for consideration at the on-going UNHRC session in Geneva.”

Of course, there was an (implied) reference to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa writing twice in the past weeks to Prime Minister Manmonhan Singh on the UNHRC vote, and urging the Centre to vote for the resolution and against Sri Lanka. Other political party leaders in the State, starting with former DMK Chief Minister M Karunanidhi, have also spoken in similar vein. Union Ministers belonging to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s Congress have said that the Centre would take a decision that would be of help to the Tamils in Sri Lanka. V Narayanaswamy, Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office, was quoted as saying as much as what non-Congress leaders in Tamil Nadu have said, or demanded. So has State Congress president B S Gnanadesikan, since. Minister Krishna in his media interaction at Chennai, like his other Congress ministerial colleagues, listed out the India-aided facilities for the Tamils in that country. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under historical interpretation, Indian Ocean politics, LTTE, NGOs, politIcal discourse, power politics, Rajapaksa regime, reconciliation, rehabilitation, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, Tamil migration, truth as casualty of war, war crimes, world events & processes

Channel Four suggests that English cricket team should boycott Sri Lanka

“Andy Flower has departed for Sri Lanka today as manager of an England team reeling after a test whitewash in the UAE to Pakistan and nervous about playing on yet more slow and turning pitches.

However events off the pitch could be even trickier to handle. Sri Lanka’s cricket board is allegedly ridden by corruption, and the grounds England will play on are now run by a military that Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the United Nations and the US State Department say should be investigated for allegations of perhaps the most serious war crimes and crimes against humanity committed this century….”

SEE http://www.channel4.com/news/should-englands-cricket-team-tour-sri-lanka

The friend who sent it to me has this comment: “Here’s an example of human rights fundamentalists getting it fundamentally wrong: Attacking what is perhaps the most unifying symbol for Sri Lankans, an institution whose ethnic representativity has never been in question, and which stands to gain from the promotion of young talent from the north and east that people like Murali, Mahela and Sanga are doing so well, is not only unbelievably stupid, but also unutterably offensive. Seems like no lessons have been learnt from Amnesty’s similarly ill-conceived campaign against the Sri Lankan cricket team in the 2007 World Cup in the Caribbean.”

HE ADDS: “Contrariwise, Harry Solomons’ great little piece from Cricketique celebrates the two maxims of Sri Lankan cricket:

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, NGOs, politIcal discourse, power politics, propaganda, Rajapaksa regime, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, truth as casualty of war, war crimes, world events & processes

An Angry Sinhalese: Mahinda Gunasekera’s Protest to the Canadian Houses of Parliament

Mahinda Gunasekera, 11 January 2012**

Submission to the House of Commons Sub-Committee on Human Rights re Sri Lanka

84 Tambrook Drive, Agincourt, Ontario,  M1W 3L9, Tel. (416)4980783

Mr. Scott Reid, MP for Lanark-Frontenac-Lennox and Assington, Chair of the House of Commons Sub-Committee on Human Rights of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International  Development,and the other members of the Sub-Committee on Human Rights

Honourable Members of the House of Commons Sub-Committee on Human Rights,

Submission on the Human Rights situation in Sri Lanka: Further to my letters e-mailed to Ms. Miriam Burke, Clerk to the Sub-Committee on Human Rights with copy to Mr. Scott Reid, MP, Chair of the House of Commons Sub-Committee on Human Rights on November 24, 2011, December 1, 2011 and December 12, 2011, seeking an opportunity to appear before the Sub-Committee especially due to the fact that I was proceeding on a six week holiday to Sri Lanka from January 12, 2012.  I am now submitting my views pertaining to the period of the conflict in Sri Lanka which was decisively ended by the military defeat of the fighting forces of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), an organization designated as an international terrorist movement banned by 32 countries including Canada, by the armed forces of the duly elected Government of Sri Lanka on May 18, 2009.

I am the President of the Sri Lanka United National Association of Canada, which is a Non-Profit Community Association which has functioned since 1983 bringing an alternative viewpoint on Sri Lankan affairs to the elected parliamentarians, media and general public of Canada.  Our association represents Canadians of Sri Lankan origin from all ethnic, religious and other backgrounds with the majority of the members coming from the Sinhalese community, who have made Canada their adopted homeland. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under accountability, atrocities, disparagement, Eelam, gordon weiss, historical interpretation, LTTE, mass conscription, military strategy, NGOs, politIcal discourse, power politics, prabhakaran, propaganda, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, Tamil migration, Tamil Tiger fighters, terrorism, violence of language, world events & processes

Mine clearance in Sri Lanka could take 10 years or more

IRIN News

Landmine clearance in Sri Lanka’s conflict-affected north could take more than a decade, experts say. “It is expected to take [in] excess of 10 years to fully mitigate all remaining contamination in Sri Lanka,” the Mine Action Project of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) [ http://www.undp.lk/What_We_Do/Pages/Mine_Action.aspx ] in Sri Lanka told IRIN, citing a lack of resources coupled with the difficult nature of the work.

Approximately 126 sqkm of land remains to be cleared in the island’s north at the end of 2011, according to data from the National Mine Action Centre (NMAC). Set up in July 2010, NMAC is the government’s lead agency in de-mining work in the country. As of 31 December 2011, the largest remaining area was in Mannar District (33.8 sqkm), followed by Mullaitivu (27.7 sqkm), Kilinochchi (23 sqkm), Vavuniya (15 sqkm) and Jaffna (5 sqkm) in the north. Smaller areas are in borderline districts of Polonnaruwa and Anuradhapura, along with some parts of the east.

Barrier to return: More than 6,700 conflict-displaced, mainly from Mullaitivu District, continue to live at Menik Farm [http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=89572 ] outside the town of Vavuniya, where more than 200,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) once lived following the end of the war [ http://www.irinnews.org/printreport.aspx?reportid=89904 ] between government forces and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which had been fighting for an independent Tamil homeland since 1983 [http://www.irinnews.org/printreport.aspx?reportid=84146].

According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) [http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/srilanka_hpsl/Files/Situation%20Reports/Joint%20Humanitarian%20Update/LKRN057_JHERU_Nov-Dec_2011.pdf ], since 1 January 2009, more than 554 sqkm have been cleared of mines and UXO (unexploded ordnance) in the north and east of the country.

The humanitarian demining unit of the Sri Lanka Army, international organizations – Danish Demining Group (DDG), HALO Trust, Horizon, Mines Advisory Group (MAG), Sarvatra, and Swiss Foundation for Mine Action (FSD)] – and two national organizations – Delvon Assistance for Social Harmony (DASH) and the Milinda Moragoda Institute for Peoples’ Empowerment (MMIPE)] – are engaged in demining work.

The UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) carries out mine risk awareness programmes in the north and east. The UNDP Mine Action Unit said most of the surveys to identify the mine risk areas had been completed, but the task of clearing the mines and UXO remains time-consuming and labour-intensive.

“It turns out there aren’t any fancy scanners or high-tech mine-removal gadgets that can compete with old-fashioned sweat, discipline, and patience when it comes to picking mines out of the ground,” US diplomat Emily Fleckner said during a December site visit to Kilinochchi, where some of fiercest fighting once took place. [ http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/site/entry/halo_trust_demining_site ].

Fleckner wrote in a blog post for the State Department that officials with HALO Trust told her the organization had removed more mines in Sri Lanka during its first year of operation than all its other de-mining work combined worldwide over the same period of time.

Funding questions: But it is the overall issue of funding that has people worried most almost two years since the war was officially declared over. UNDP’s Mine Action Project says the slow work of removing mines was “compounded by decreasing donor funding” for themselves and other mine clearance agencies.

On 22 January[http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/F_R_570.pdf], DDG said in an update that it had been forced to reduce its capacity by 20 percent since late 2010 due to funding constraints. DDG doubled its clearing capacity soon after the war ended in May 2009. “[But], in late 2010/early 2011 this was followed by an unheralded decrease in funding, especially amongst our major donors who reviewed their strategies globally and in particular towards Sri Lanka.”

The group has since warned of further reductions if funding constraints persist. NMAC estimates it will cost more than US$100 million to demine the last 126 sqkm.

Meanwhile, for those who have returned to their places of origin, the need to remain vigilant continues. “We know they are still around,” Mathiyavaratham Manivannan, a 32-year-old farmer in Mullaitivu District said, noting that mine-awareness programmes had made it easier for him to identify mines and UXO. “We don’t find them that often now, but we do come across them, especially when we clear new land.”

According to UNICEF, mine-related incidents were on the decline due to intense awareness programmes [ http://irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=90899 ]. More than 23,000 returnees took part in such programmes in December 2011 alone, with mine risk education continuing in both the north and east of the country, OCHA reported. In 2011, only 17 mine-related incidents were reported, down from 27 a year earlier. The casualty rate also dropped from 47 to 24.

This report online: http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportID=94798

1 Comment

Filed under disaster relief team, IDP camps, law of armed conflict, life stories, LTTE, NGOs, population, rehabilitation, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society, Tamil civilians, tamil refugees, world events & processes

Rasalingam decimates Jehan Perera’s sterile PC position on the role of the military in the north today

Sebastian Rasalingam of Toronto, courtesy of the Island, 10 November 2011, where a different title prevailed: “Army ‘Kadaigals’ in the North – Bane or Boon?” **

I read Jehan Perera’s take on “Economic and political costs of over extending military role”. Perera is an NGO spokesman who used to demand that the Army be confined to the barracks, even during the peak of Tiger mayhem. So, his views on the military in the North should surprise none.

‘Policy alternative to the war’: Consider the view of Tamils who do not own land near Colombo (or Toronto!). They have been working on Peria Dorei’s land or at his business for a pittance since colonial times. They were conscripted to fight the battles orchestrated by the Tigers and funded from London or Toronto. How could they care about  “Arasu”, “language” or “University Entrance”, when their children were denied decent schools or a fair-wage job.  The poor Sinhalese youth were also hit by the Eelam wars. The youth  of the social class of Jehan Perera were not involved in the war. They remained sceptical of the military option. “Keep the army in the barracks, let us have talks, and graciously  give Prabha the few hectares of dry zone that he is clamouring for”; this was the “policy alternative” to war proclaimed by Jehan-Perera types.  This suited the mercantile and military interests of the west. The lot of the Tamils under a Tiger Megalomaniac was irrelevant to the “polished” civil society.  They wanted to punish the rioting Sinhala-‘yokels’ who usurped the power of the Colombo class since 1956. Prabhakaran was surely the ideal cat’s paw.

Ending war and mending North: The determined attack against the Tigers worked. Some 300,000 IDPs were forcibly taken to Nandikadal by the retreating Tigers. They escaped when the army broke the Tiger-built earth bunds. That was in May 2009. The IDPs had to be fed, medically treated, and separated from terrorists. The TNA and their “civil society friends” flashed pictures of barbed wire fences of welfare centres claiming that they were Nazi concentration camps; they wanted the IDPs released immediately. However, by all honest accounts the government did a great and humane job, unaided by the Tamil Diaspora or the TNA which claimed that those were torture camps. Tiger money was no doubt used to buy out some Tigers who arrived in the West on board smuggler-ships. Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under IDP camps, life stories, LTTE, NGOs, politIcal discourse, reconciliation, rehabilitation, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society, Tamil civilians, tolerance, welfare & philanthophy, world events & processes

International Migration: Tensions & Misrepresentations — A View from southern Africa

Courtesy of IRIN News

About 214 million people were living and working outside their home country in 2010, and international migration has continued to grow despite the global economic crisis, but in many countries negative attitudes towards migrants are also rising. The International Organization for Migration (IOM), focusing on the importance of communicating more effectively about migration in its World Migration Report 2011 [http://publications.iom.int/ bookstore/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=752&zenid=f838c3201667ef014e1754354073f6b5 ], released on 6 December, notes that such attitudes stem in part from misinformation and misperceptions about migration that have been fuelled by opportunistic politicians and poor media reporting. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under discrimination, immigration, life stories, NGOs, politIcal discourse, population, welfare & philanthophy, world events & processes

IOM clarifies role in reintegrating Tigers into society

Shamindra Ferdinando, courtesy of the Island, 1 December 2011

 A former Tiger with an IOM official

A project, spearheaded by the International Organization for Migration (IOM), to rehabilitate those who had fought for the LTTE is nearing completion, with Japan, too, throwing its weight behind the programme. The IOM launched the project in the East in early 2009 and subsequently expanded it to the Northern Province, the home for the majority of ex-LTTE combatants and support personnel. IOM Chief of Mission Richard Danziger said that the Northern project got underway in 2010 following the conclusion of the conflict. [The LTTE was crushed on the banks of the Nanthikadal lagoon on May 19, 2009].

In a brief interview with The Island, Danziger said that Japan had recently provided 1.5 mn USD (more than Rs. 150 mn) for the ongoing project aimed at reintegrating former LTTE personnel to the civil society and reconciliation efforts.  Danziger said that there hadn’t been any previous contributions by Japan towards this particular project, which received initial backing from the Netherlands, US, UK and Norway. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under democratic measures, life stories, LTTE, NGOs, politIcal discourse, reconciliation, rehabilitation, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, Tamil Tiger fighters, tolerance, welfare & philanthophy, world events & processes

The World Bank – does it cash in on the deprived?

Michael O’Leary, Courtesy of Lanka Monthly Digest, 11 October 2011 edn … also see http://lmd.lk/

The World Bank’s (WB) official goal is the reduction of poverty and its function is to provide loans to developing countries for capital programmes. In the 1940s and ’50s, the bank adopted a conservative approach and its level of lending was low. From 1968, its President Robert McNamara shifted policy towards measures like building schools and hospitals, improving literacy and agricultural reform. Keynesianism was the ideology of the lender’s bureaucrat-economists, whose ideals echoed the domestic policies of the US governments of the time – LBJ’s Great Society, with its emphasis on growth and redistribution as a remedy for poverty.

McNamara’s Treasurer Eugene Rotberg acquired capital from the global bond market. Ironically, Swiss banks (many of which hoard much of the money looted by dictators from developing nations) contributed a substantial share of these funds. Unfortunately, from 1976 to 1980, debt levels in developing nations rose at an average annual rate of 20 per cent. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under accountability, american imperialism, NGOs, politIcal discourse, welfare & philanthophy, World Bank, world events & processes