The Plight of Indian “Fishermen” in Sri Lankan Waters

Fateh Veer Singh Guram, in The Diplomat, 19 March 2022, witht his title “India, Sri Lanka, and the Fishers Caught in the Middle”

April 2, 2011, is a day etched in the memories of millions of Indians. Under a clear sky, at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai, more than 30,000 people screamed Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s name as he hit the winning six, lifting India’s second Cricket World Cup in the process. As the country erupted in celebration, nearly 1,600 kilometers away, Cinna Thambi’s world came crashing down. “A bunch of fishers came to me that day, and told me that the Sri Lankan Navy had arrested my younger brother, Victus,” Thambi, who is the Coordinator of the National Traditional Fishermen Federation, told The Diplomat. “Eight days later, on April 10, 2011, his body washed up on the Sri Lankan shores. Following a post-mortem, a doctor confessed to me that my brother had been tortured and murdered.” 

Victus is among the nearly 400 Indian Tamilian fishers who have been killed by the Sri Lankan Navy after they allegedly crossed over into Sri Lanka’s maritime boundary. The Sri Lankan Navy has accused Indian fishers of poaching in the resource-rich waters off the island nation’s coast, which often leads to arrests and shootings targeted against Indian fishers. Indian fishers, on the other hand, say that climate change, rising costs, and dwindling catches are forcing them to venture farther into the sea, and eventually, into Sri Lankan waters.

“The decision to give Kachchatheevu to Sri Lanka is viewed as a historical blunder by the fisher community since it reflects a lack of understanding on part of Delhi-based bureaucrats regarding the religious and cultural importance that the island holds in our lives,” Jones Spartegus, a doctoral research scholar from Thoothukudi, said.

The ceding of the island to Sri Lanka has further complicated the maritime boundary between the two nations, and as a result, more than 400 Indian fishers have been killed due to the confusion related to the maritime boundary,” he added.

Indian fishers, however, had greater access to Sri Lankan waters while the Civil War was raging in Sri Lanka. When the war broke out in the 1980s, the Sri Lankan military banned fishers from venturing out into the sea in the country’s northern provinces, citing security concerns. As a result, many Indian fishers accessed Sri Lankan waters, and this also led to an increase in Indian vessels in the region. When the war ended in 2009, Sri Lankan fishers began demanding their rights to fish in Sri Lanka’s waters. The Sri Lankan Navy also strengthened patrolling off the country’s north coast, fearing a return of militancy. This led to increased confrontations between Sri Lanka’s maritime forces and Indian fishers.

“While patrolling has increased, the Sri Lankan Navy has not been able to prevent Indian fishers from accessing our waters,” explained M.M. Alam, the vice chair of the Northern Province Fisher People’s Union, based in Jaffna, Sri Lanka. “Furthermore, fishers in the North are still reeling from the effects of the Civil War. Prior to the War breaking out, fishers in northern Sri Lanka contributed nearly 40 percent of the country’s catch, but that declined drastically due to the conflict,” Alam added. Sri Lankan fishers have also lamented that they do not have adequate boats, nets, and technology to be able to compete with Indian fishers.

With Sri Lanka’s economy suffering on account of large levels of foreign debt, taking care of daily expenses has become a difficult task for fishers in northern Sri Lanka, many of whom come from the marginalized Tamil community, which was also targeted during the Civil War.

“The government has taken up the construction of fishing harbors in north Sri Lanka, but one can see a number of bottom trawlers in these harbors. Fishers in the north do not have the money to afford trawlers, which shows that the government is encouraging fishers from the south to fish in the north,” Herman Kumara, national convener of the National Fisheries Solidarity Movement, said. “Such discriminatory tactics are further impacting northern fishers economically.”

The economic condition of fishers in India is not much better. Rising fuel prices have pushed up the cost of fishing tremendously, while an increase in sea water temperatures has also adversely impacted fish populations near the coast.

“Ten years ago, the cost of fuel was less and the boats were small, too, since we never needed to venture so far out into the sea. We could easily get a decent catch near the shore. But with the warming of the sea water, the fish have stopped breeding near the shore, which has forced us to venture further out to the sea,” said Dhana Lakshmi, a fisher and member of the Karaikal District Women Federation.

Since fishers need to travel greater distances, they also need to invest in bigger boats. “Earlier, the cost of constructing a boat, along with the nets was 6 million rupees. Now, it is anywhere between 15-18 million rupees,” Lakshmi said. She also explained that with an increase in commercialization of the fishing sector, the nets that fishers use can’t be repaired if they tear. “We could easily repair our old nets earlier, but now we need to buy new ones, which are expensive and further push up costs.”

As fishers in India grapple with increasing expenses, they struggle to break even and earn a livelihood. This is what forces them to take greater risks. “Thomas Jefferson said that with great risks come great rewards. But these days, fishers take such great risks that they end up paying with their lives. All so that they can put food on their tables,” Cinna Thambi said.

Indian fishers have also argued that that government of India has promoted the use of bottom trawlers in order to catch prawns since 1976 and, because of this, traditional fishers cannot be blamed for using the trawlers. Catching prawns is extremely profitable and since most of the catch is exported to countries abroad, it is also an important source of foreign exchange for India.

“The Union Government is keen on ensuring that more and more prawns are fished from the sea, since that yields greater revenue,” Spartegus explained. “Trawlers are expensive, so how can traditional fishers buy a trawler? These are provided by the government through subsidies. On one hand they provide us with the tools and on the other they say we are affecting the marine ecosystem.”

Spartegus further stressed the need for a change in the way the fishers’ crisis in the Palk Strait is viewed. Rather than looking at the issue from a strategic and geopolitical perspective, it is important to look at it from an economic perspective. “Time and again, we hear representatives of both nations say that the rights of their respective countries are being trampled upon. What is happening here is that both countries have rich historical ties, which Tamil fishers on both sides of the border have shared for millennia,” he explained.

“When we talk about the rights of these two nations, why does no one talk about the rights of the fishers, who are struggling to maintain a dignified livelihood? Fishers are dying because of this dispute, and our leaders only make empty promises to address this issue.”


BUT note the implicit implications within this Map 


Filed under accountability, atrocities, centre-periphery relations, communal relations, cultural transmission, disparagement, economic processes, ethnicity, foreign policy, governance, historical interpretation, island economy, legal issues, life stories, politIcal discourse, press freedom, security, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, slanted reportage, sri lankan society, transport and communications, truth as casualty of war, unusual people, world events & processes

2 responses to “The Plight of Indian “Fishermen” in Sri Lankan Waters

    “The author is playing footsie and deploying “History’ TO smother complications such as SMUGGLING …. & STATE RIGHTS …WHILE GLOSSING OVER THE RECENT HISTORY where the LTTE strength was in its Karaiyar core and nautical nous.”

  2. Mr. K.

    An article embedded with biases that makes Sri Lanka and India-SL relations look like the villain. Apart from the security issues, if global warming is causing a problem to Indian fishermen within their boundaries, this does not mean they should have the right to venture into Sri Lankan waters to source fish thereby depriving local fishermen of their rights to fish in their own waters. When Chinese fishing boats do such things in the territorial waters of other countries, using massive drag nets, the West condemn them for breaking international law, illegal poaching, and territorial infringement. But when it occurs against Sri Lanka, this writer for The Diplomat takes the Indian side portraying their fishermen as victims. Why, I wonder? What’s the agenda? The rights of fishermen are not independent of the obligations of the nation to which they belong.

    Also, where is the evidence that the disappearnce of fish from Indian waters is due to global warming? Where is the evidence that fish in Indian waters are moving south into Sri Lankan waters because of global warming? That could well be a red-herring as it might also be due to over-fishing, which usually leads to the depletion of fish in Indian waters. One would hope the Indian government are constantly monitoring how much fish is taken from their waters each month and whether this is causing a depletion of fish, and if so, what policies have been formulated to ensure there is no overfishing, so fish can thrive in their waters. If global warming were the reason, then it is likely to impact more on Sri Lanka as it does for the tea industry in Sri Lanka.

Leave a Reply