A Medical Friend in Lanka: “In response to Dr Justin Labrooy’s email about Ivermectin usage: I totally agree that people should not self-medicate. It can be very dangerous.”
Dr Peter McCullough MD, testified to the Texas Senate HHS Committee. He has done a lot of work on early treatment of Covid. He found the best treatment to be sequential multidrug treatment, one drug alone does not seem to work.
Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee …. LISTEN
2,063,266 views …………….Mar 12, 2021
This is the research paper he mentions: https://rcm.imrpress.com/article/2020/2153-8174/RCM2020264.shtml
The SARS-CoV-2 virus spreading across the world has led to surges of COVID-19 illness, hospitalizations, and death. The complex and multifaceted pathophysiology of life-threatening COVID-19 illness including viral mediated organ damage, cytokine storm, and thrombosis warrants early interventions to address all components of the devastating illness. In countries where therapeutic nihilism is prevalent, patients endure escalating symptoms and without early treatment can succumb to delayed in-hospital care and death. Prompt early initiation of sequenced multidrug therapy (SMDT) is a widely and currently available solution to stem the tide of hospitalizations and death. A multipronged therapeutic approach includes 1) adjuvant nutraceuticals, 2) combination intracellular anti-infective therapy, 3) inhaled/oral corticosteroids, 4) antiplatelet agents/anticoagulants, 5) supportive care including supplemental oxygen, monitoring, and telemedicine. Randomized trials of individual, novel oral therapies have not delivered tools for physicians to combat the pandemic in practice. No single therapeutic option thus far has been entirely effective and therefore a combination is required at this time. An urgent immediate pivot from single drug to SMDT regimens should be employed as a critical strategy to deal with the large numbers of acute COVID-19 patients with the aim of reducing the intensity and duration of symptoms and avoiding hospitalization and death.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; hospitalization; mortality; ambulatory treatment; anti-infective; anti-inflammatory; antiviral; corticosteroid; antiplatelet agent; anticoagulant; sequenced multidrug therapy
ALSO SEE https://www.uscjournal.com/authors/peter-mccullough
5 responses to “Beating COVID …. Sequential Multi-Drug Treatment”
It’s 2021 now, and science knows a great deal more about Covid-19 than when it first emerged. This study is from 2020, published four months before the first vaccines were deployed. It’s outdated should be ignored.
I refer to it because it shows the chart with the treatment protocol explained, that he has been using since SARS-Cov-2 emerged in 2020. Whilst following this early treatment, he has lost only two patients. If you Google him there are many papers and videos referring to his work. Please watch the video of the Senate committee meeting (March 2021), he still recommends the multi drug protocol, as he and many US doctors have had continuing success with it. I don’t know this doctor, but if the treatment he suggests works, why not embrace it.
Wouldn’t Sequential Multi-Drug Treatment lead to sequential side effects on the patient? A majority of “inoculations/injections” do have their intrinsic potential to induce diverse physiological reactions on different persons. They can vary from temporary innocuous inflammations to life threatening allergic effects. The temporal sequential ill effects if any are also yet unknown. However, one has to realise that unless medical researchers find an extremely effective single dose vaccine with minimal side effects, we have Hobson’s choice!
I’m not able to comment on possible side effects from the sequential multi-drug treatment, but as mentioned above, Dr McCullough has only lost two patients, whilst using this treatment, which is remarkable. The Senate committee meeting video is very informative. As for the vaccine, not exactly Hobson’s choice, as treatment has been successful using this protocol. So everyone has two choices, take it, or don’t.
I can comment on possible side effects and deaths after taking the vaccine, beause it’s public data. I am not an anti-vaxxer, I’m just saying, this should be included in the procedure of informed consent, and it is not:
Pfizer Adverse Effects Yellow Card Reports UK:
284,776 adverse effects and 486 deaths
Astra-Zeneca Adverse Effects Yellow Card Reports UK:
809,489 adverse effects and 1036 deaths
545,337 adverse effects and 12,336 deaths
(figures from 2 weeks ago).
As for the vaccine, it’s not exactly Hobson’s choice, as treatment of Covid infection has been successful using this multi-drug protocol. So everyone has two choices, take it, or don’t.