Capt Prasanna Rajaratne, SLN … in DAILY FT, 6 December 2024, ….. where the title reads “National security only through national harmony“
They may still feel trapped in the same plight, and unless that perception is acknowledged, addressed, and their aspirations realised, the resurgence of dissent is not merely possible but inevitable
- Reconciliation not estrangement – inclusivity not exclusivity
It is now 15 years since the end of a brutal 30-year conflict. Yet, we remain trapped in a cycle of grief, division, and mistrust. This cannot continue. If we do, we will head down a path to ruin.
A rare and golden opportunity stands before us now. The recently concluded general elections have sent a powerful message: our communities are ready to rise above the shackles of communal politics and chart a new course toward unity and hope.
Addressing the matter now has profound significance in view of the ‘Maaveerar Naal’ (Great Heroes Day) that fell on 27 November, and comments made by a newly appointed independent MP representing the Jaffna District. Both are related.
The Maaveerar Naal commemoration by the Tamil community on the north is two-fold; firstly, remembering those who have died, both civilians and LTTE combatants, during the brutal and long-drawn internecine conflict, and secondly, honouring the militant leader of the struggle, his movement and his demand for a separate state. Whilst the first reason of remembering the dead is fully justified, the second reason of honouring a leader, a movement and a map delineating boundaries of the area of the clamoured independent state is considered illegal as they remains proscribed.
Justification of commemorating the dead requires no contention or debate. There is nothing wrong in the Tamil community wanting to commemorate the LTTE dead as much as the majority community have the right to commemorate their own dead. Even monuments and memorials are perfectly in order. That is part of history. Solemn commemoration ceremonies should be encouraged and even be undertaken jointly with Government patronage. It would become a global model for reconciliation.
A refuge from discrimination
The second reason should be the true focus for analyses due to its profound significance. Why does the Tamil community still revere and honour a proscribed movement for emancipation? The only reasonable inference is that they had confidence in the uprising, a refuge from real or imagined discrimination, a beacon of hope for equality and feel grateful for the sacrifices made to secure an honourable future. Sadly, the lingering perception of inequality, injustice, oppression, marginalisation, and deprivation persists, even after the leader’s death. That is a stark indictment of the failures of successive Governments to fulfil the aspirations of the Tamil community for equality, justice, liberation, inclusivity and opportunity. What is relevant here is how the aggrieved feels not what anyone else says.
Many in the Tamil community may have seen the LTTE leader as a saviour. There is nothing wrong in that with the plight they were in then. They may still feel trapped in the same plight, and unless that perception is acknowledged, addressed, and their aspirations realised, the resurgence of dissent is not merely possible but inevitable, threatening to unleash profound and destabilising consequences. Decentralisation of power including Police powers, use of own language, freedom to practise religious and cultural traditions without any reservation are vital for true autonomy and dignity. That is unity in diversity. In the long term, inclusivity demands that all communities learn both Sinhalese and Tamil, the most widely used languages of the country. How meaningful would it be for the National Anthem to be sung in Tamil!
Sowing seeds of suspicion and hatred
Yet, there are communal elements seeking to sow seeds of suspicion and hatred, constantly invoking the wounds of our violent past to stir up fear, resentment, division, and assert supremacy. They categorically denounce and condemn Maaveerar Naal in its entirety. Their rhetoric threatens to reignite the very tensions we strive to leave behind.
The fear, resentment and division are stirred citing national security, a convenient excuse to avoid confronting reality. That is a clear sign of denial and cowardice. National security is grounded on assessment of threats known as the ‘threat perception’ and not in manipulation of past fears. Throughout history, Sri Lanka has endured invasions and external threats; from Chola, Kalinga and Magha to the Portuguese, Dutch and the British. Those threats have now receded. We face no imminent external military threat now. The perceived threat now is internal uprisings and strife due to disharmony, disunity and discord leading to dissent and disillusionment. That is the challenge that needs to be addressed.
The only path of ensuring national security is through national harmony, which in turn can only be achieved by reconciling past differences rather than perpetuating division and estrangement or asserting supremacy. The best way is to learn from the great teacher, Lord Buddha, on how he, having realised human frailty and underlying reasons of the fiendish acts of Angulimala, enlightened and transformed him by explaining that “fire cannot be doused by fire but only by water”.
Majority in Sri Lanka are adherents of Lord Buddha. Applicability of such teachings is eternal. Realising that, the majority has to take the lead and display magnanimity now that the chapter of conflict is over. That great teaching leads us to appreciate principles of justice and empathy for all, devoid of asserting supremacy of one community over another. True unity comes from unconditional inclusivity, not exclusivity—a collective effort to embrace diversity and build a shared future.
Underlying reasons
As I have mentioned in my article titled, “Rejection and role morality: Only way out of the abyss” published in Financial Times on 30 August 2024, all violent dissent in Sri Lanka were valid in their own right. (The link to the article is at the end of this article.) There are always underlying reasons, invariably inequality, injustice, marginalisation, and deprivation, exacerbated when dissent is met with oppression. We should seek to understand the root causes of such eruptions and address them with wisdom. Only through such introspection and meaningful change can dissent be resolved and harmony restored. True reconciliation must emerge from within, guided by inclusivity and understanding. It can never be imposed upon as that leads to disdain and repulsion. Inclusivity is a major management tool clearly emphasised in Japanese management principles that is equally applicable within a family, classroom or office.
Deriding the defeated and asserting supremacy is a mark of poor character. True greatness lies in showing magnanimity in victory—a hallmark of a noble and honourable winner. Building edifices to commemorate victory deepens the division as it ridicules the defeated. An erudite Buddhist monk declined the invitation to attend an opening of such an edifice a few years ago citing exactly the same reason. It is said that King Dutugemunu even built a tomb for his adversary demanding utmost respect from passersby. That is a genuine sign of magnanimity in victory!
To weave a vibrant tapestry of unity, the new Government should actively promote inter-community celebrations. By supporting reciprocal visits and joint celebrations for occasions like Vesak, New Year, Ramazan, Haj, Thai Pongal, Deepavali, Christmas, and many others. Events commemorating the dead should also be jointly conducted, and then, we can foster a more inclusive and harmonious society.
If we do it right, I am certain the Tamil and Muslim communities will fight alongside the Sinhalese as Sri Lankans against any threat. Brothers in arms! I yearn for that day!
Link to my previous article = ………………………………………….. https://www.ft.lk/opinion/Rejection-and-role-morality-Only-way-out-of-the-abyss/14-766174#goog_rewarded
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
A NOTE from The Editor, Thuppahi
That this message and plea for reconciliation should be presented by a Sinhala member of the armed services is significant. THAT does not make the ses of arguments here any less problematic and even naive. The remembrance services after World War Two were shaped by the victors, namely, the British and their allies. It would have been unthinkable for these moments to honour Hitler and his aides or the Japanese military machine in the same ceremony.
From early on in the emerging SL Tamil resistance to Sinhala political domination or weightage, the Tamil youth groups in resistance showed no toleration for each other and for the Tamil moderate leaders in parliamentary politics. Pirapaharan’s instinct was to reach for his gun at every moment of tussle. Ask those in the EPRLF and PLOTE who remain alive today. Ask Rajiv Gandhi’s kinfolk.
For the French, British and their allies to commemorate Hitler in the 1950s and 1960s …. or even today ….. would ahev been an act of political travesty.
This refusal does not deny the need to promote reconciliation and the end of persisting discriminations today in the spirit espoused by Captain Rajaratne. Courageous actions of a symbolic nature towards reconciliation with the northern Tamil peoples were taken in the recent past by such personages as Kumar Sangakkara, Mahela Jayawardene and Ian Botham. The charitable work of Vanni Hope, FOG and Somasundaram Skandakumar are among the programmes that assist the coming together of the SL Tamil peoples and the Sinhala, Moor, Malay, Burgher and other ethnic clusters within the island’s configuration. All these efforts, of course, have been tiny gestures outside the main realms of politics.
A welcome sign of potential amity has just been seen in the field of cricket. It appears that two lads from the Jaffna Peninsula may be integral parts of Sri Lanka’s present Under 19 squad. I refer to Kugadas Mathulan and Newton Ranjitkumar.
One of the Under 19 stars certainly is a Tamil, albeit a lad from St. Benedict’s College in Colombo — referring here to Sharujan Shanmuganathan who scored a century vs Afghanistan recently.
While this is also a realm outside politics, it is a heartening sign and has more ramifying implications than the meeasures maked by Sangakkara and company. The cricketing arena is field of patriotism and can generate deep currents.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
What refreshing thought from a military man Capt Prasanna Rajaratne. I applaud his courage in writing this at Daily FT. Specifically, I liked his sentences, “Building edifices to commemorate victory deepens the division as it ridicules the defeated. An erudite Buddhist monk declined the invitation to attend an opening of such an edifice a few years ago citing exactly the same reason. It is said that King Dutugemunu even built a tomb for his adversary demanding utmost respect from passersby. That is a genuine sign of magnanimity in victory!”
Sadly, when offered an opportunity in 2009, Rajapaksa rascals couldn’t repeat what King Dutugemunu did in 161 BC. May I say that King Dutugemunu’s holy spirit, eventually defanged the hubris exhibited by the Rajapaksa rascals as well as General Sarath Fonseka, to their vanuished rival in the battle field.
Then, here is my criticism on your ‘Note from the editor’. You may take it or leave it. You had quipped, “Ask Rajiv Gandhi’s kinfolk.” For what? Have you read, Sonia Gandhi’s coffee-table book ‘Rajiv’? In it, she had mentioned about the gun-whacking Rajiv received in Colombo by a naval rating on July 1987, and that Rajiv couldn’t sleep on the side of his shoulder for a long time. This was before May 21, 1991. You casually ignore the thousands who lost their lives in Sri Lanka, between Oct.1987 and March 1990, mainly DUE to the ignorance and arrogance of Rajiv Gandhi
In your haste to score brownie points among the anti-LTTE pals in India, you had ignored two vital facts. (1) It was Rajiv Gandhi and his cronies in the South Bloc in Delhi who played the aggressor game and bullying against Sri Lankans, and NOT Prabhakaran. (2) What was the contribution of RAW gumshoes, who split the Tamil militants into groups and made them to dance according to their beats Prabhakaran was the sole exception. In reality, between 1989 and 1990, when the SL army generals were thigh-bounded (even when President Premadasa cajoled them) to take on the IPKF, it was Prabhakaran’s boys who stood up to defend SL territory.
cyber security course
Such a great information. This is really very helpful for bloggers
https://stellarcollege.edu/cyber-security/