Can we say that all the Nobel Laureates who believe that glyphosate is a very safe herbicide are all paid agents of Monsanto?
On 31st July 2016 100 Nobel Laureates made a press release in Washington Post, condemning these attacks, and asking “environmental” organizations like Green Peace to desist from funding bogus research designed to prove that glyphosate is dangerous. Example, giving glyphosate to species of rabbits that are known to easily get cancer, and then claiming that such research proves that glyphosate causes cancer.
Glyphosate was banned claiming that it caused kidney disease in the Rajarata. But there is ot even a single piece of clinical or experimental evidence to support it, so people like Dilrook Kannagngara are forced to talk of aphids dying of glyphosate – a good thing for farmers who want to get rid of aphids.
Can we say that anyone who gets a Shell scholarship is going to support fossil fuel? Can we say that someone who gets his/her medical degree in Public Health from Bristol University will become a spokesman for cigarettes because Bristol U was (and still is) funded by a multinational cigarette company? Even nin Sri Lanka, Ceylon Tobacco (which should be made to close its tobacco plantations) gives scholarships and funds charities etc., and so are all those scholars supporters of Tobacco?
The dis-infromation campaign of the whole foods supermarket chains is more successful because it is based on frightening the consumer.
But it cannot ultimately succeed because organic food is 4-5 times as expensive as conventional supermarket food, and it is also environmentally more damaging..
Dilrook Kannangara (DK) pulls out of the internet. Of course the paper must may be very respectable. But it is what you do with its contents that matters. Let us take one of his papers, e.g.,
If DK had looked at the amounts of glyphosate involved, he will also see that farmers don’t use such amounts of glyphosate, but only a tiny minuscule of it. So, unfortunately, the farmers have to use some other approach to get rid of aphids.
Volume 110, Issue 5, 1 2018, Pages 509-516
Treatment by glyphosate-based herbicide alters life history parameters of the rose-grain aphid Metopolophium dirhodum
So give the threshold where the impact of glyphosate on insects started. How many parts per billion, or parts per million, or parts per thousand, or parts per hundred, or what ever. And what are these insects or organisms? Fireflies, buble bees, earthworms?
Don’t forget that since the 1925 Scoops trial, many teachers and professors have been jailed in the US for teaching the theory of Evolution, deemed a blasphemous lie by US courts.
There is NOT ONE proven case of Kidney disease caused by
glyphosate in the Rajarata, or it affecting the livestock and household pets that drink this water claimed to be “poisoned” by glyphosate and other agrochemicals.
Every one who has got the kidney disease are people who drank from their own wells in high ground where there is NO agrochemical contamination.
The wells are found to have fluoride and magnesium from geological sources. Such water, when fed to laboratory rats, get kidney dsiease. But laboratory vrats fed water with glyphosate do not get kidney disease.
98% of the patients who have died of kidney did not show any glyphosate under autopsy. The 2% who showed some signs of glyphosate were at such low levels that they were well within the uncertainty of the tests.
So he can authoritatively say “except for glypostae, of course”!
Attached hereto is yet another short 0.58sec clip[attached] gleaned off a lecture by Dr. Lee Merritt concluding presentation with the foll quip: “Face Masks Don’t work. You’re either being Played or Paid“!
Presentation referred to by her in that clip appear to have not been censored by thought police.. yet! mirrored elsewhere by the many..
Rise of Medical Technocracy Lee Merritt, M.D.
Article published 18 years ago during SARS-1 event;
Farce mask: it’s safe for only 20 minutes
April 27, 2003
“ .. masks are only effective so long as they are dry.. As soon as they become saturated with the moisture in your breath they stop doing their job and pass on the droplets..that could take as little as 15 or 20 minutes..” -Prof Yvonne Cossart Dept Infectious Diseases University of Sydney.
Excerpts seen in most recent analysis[March 10, 2021] on mask deployment, associated with numerous citations:[a]
“ Summary: Children do not readily acquire SARS-CoV-2 (very low risk), spread it to other children or teachers, or endanger parents or others at home. This is the settled science. Masking can do positive harm to children – as it can to some adults. But the cost benefit analysis is entirely different for adults and children – particularly younger children. Whatever arguments there may be for consenting adults – children should not be required to wear masks to prevent the spread of Covid-19…“
“..Additionally, data now suggests (even though still nascent) that children not only have extremely low risk as mentioned above but also that they naturally have the capability of evading the SARS-CoV-2 virus due to the lack of the ACE-2 receptors in their nostrils. It escapes us as to why this deceit continues to be served to the public and has not been stopped forthwith… “
“..Given this knowledge it is more than perplexing as to why our governments, at the behest of their public health advisors, have been accepted as a fait accompli what we refer to as a ‘great deception’ or lie, convincing us of inevitable and severe consequences if anyone is infected with SARS-CoV-2. ..“
“... If you wouldn’t put a child in the front seat of your Prius without disabling the airbag – think twice before requiring an otherwise healthy child to wear a mask – or even forcing them to social distance in school..“
Even though good professor entrusted with educational matters for our children appear to have become somewhat stooped due to advanced age, one hopes that ‘backbone’ demonstrated among other matters, to kick Prof Nalin de Silva out of his job continues to function. And that, he would have courage, foresight & the conviction to stand firm against treacherous destruction caused by masking our school children. Their development irrevocably destroyed for more than an year thus far. Such a monumental disaster for our children never was allowed to occur even during a murderous terrorist infection spanning close to three decades.
We may have opted to act in compliance with sheep maneuver for certain reasons for the time being. Which began with a mask mandate, shut down for ‘few weeks to flatten the curve’, then off/on extensions for months until the arrival of Godot(mRNA serum aka vaccine!) & now, following vaccine deployment, there is no guarantee of re-infection, mutations of virus arriving at n’th degree, more successive booster shots needed, continue with mask mandates, social distancing, lock-downs etc.? Grand deception on humanity appear to have gone full circle inculcating assumption that the idea known as innate immunity within ourselves serving humanity for over unknown millennia had ceased to exist!
Observe not only Ruskie leader but also WWII veterans around him in age group allegedly at most risk to damn virus w/o face masks?
Around 12 thousand soldiers participated in parade neither practicing social distancing nor sporting face masks.
They showcased fly past of SU-57 fighters during event for those interested. Perhaps we should assume that Ruskies were grandstanding propaganda to boost Sputnik-V deployment or perhaps an attempt show middle finger to an ongoing global agenda to impose medical tyranny?
[a] Masking Children: Tragic, Unscientific, and Damaging
Paul E. Alexander McMaster University -Reading Time: 9 minutes
– March 10, 2021
[b]Russia celebrates WWII Victory Day with traditional grand military parade in Moscow (FULL VIDEO) — RT
Moscow hosts Victory Day parade on Red Square
Attached video clips;
1./ Dr. Merrit-‘face Masks’_[May 07]
2./ Suffocating their own children under government order
3./ “I can’t breathe in this mask”! End the child abuse! Masks Don’t Work!_Max Igan[May 7]