At 7.28 pm on the 17th September 2009 Jim Macdonald of Amnesty International in USA posted an article “Sri Lanka: international investigations still needed” within the official AI web site. This immediately attracted a vibrant series of blogs that invariably involved a great deal of cross-talk of varying degrees of considered speech, juvenile riposte and abuse among bloggers who were anti-government, pro-government and/or relatively non-partisan. Macdonald was invariably measured and polite in his responses and tried to answer most of the responses.
Taken as a whole this corpus of commentary and debate can be confusing. But there are interesting threads of argument. One such strand was the series of arguments between one “Mango” and Macdonald. Since Mango had appeared in this guise in my web site I was able to track him down. While retaining his
pseudonym for protective purposes, let me indicate here that he is a Sinhalese, lives in Europe and speaks German as well. From his writings and blog comments in various outlets it is evident that he is NOT a Sinhala ultra-nationalist. Moreover, he is a patently well-read and well-informed. I requested him to extract his series of jousts with Macdonald in its sequential time-frame so that the debate could be profitably studied by readers.
This debate has been inserted separately. Deciphering and digesting the discussion will call for infinite patience from readers. This is a marathon bout, toe to toe. Mango and Macdonald are nothing if not assiduous, determined and persistent. Let me assure all of you that a careful reading of thrust and counter-thrust will be quite rewarding.
Since Mango has taken the trouble to extract the discussion, he has the advantage of adding a summary at the start and placing his spin on the position adopted by Jim Macdonald and Amnesty International’s position with reference to Eelam War IV in its last stages and the subsequent placement of the Tamil “civilians” in detention centres for what turned out to be seven months (ending by 1 December 2009, when inmates could move out and return on a chit system – though that was not known when this debate raged).
For my part the greatest benefit emerging from this discussion is the clarification of Amnesty International’s stance. From general knowledge and from a long-standing family friendship with such people as Suriya Wickramasinghe, I knew that AI is well-intentioned. But what strikes me most about the AI policy towards Sri Lankais the manner in which moral adherence to the protection of humanity generates cavernous tunnel-vision. In early 2009 and during the pulsating debate on the AI web site Macdonald’s mantra was “CEASEFIRE.” A ceasefire, he believed, would save lives. So, he keeps shouting “ceasefire, ceasefire” … and directing this principle as criticism of the government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) once the war ended.
This was precisely the line advocated by high-ranking Western politicians such as Hillary Clinton, Bernard Kouchner and David Miliband. This was precisely the programme that I subjected to a scathing criticism in my article “Simpleton’s at the World’s Peak. Sri Lankan situation stumps the World” – which appeared initially under a different title in the Frontline issue of 22 May 2009. This essay is now available in print in my Fire and Storm. Essays in Sri Lankan Politics (Colombo, Vijitha Yapa Publications, 2010, pp. 289-302); with the support of two articles that had preceded it and coloured my reaction, both entitled “Dilemmas at War’s End” and entering the public realm in groundviews.org in February 2009. These essays, incidentally, had aroused considerable antipathy among those whom I referred to as “human rights extremists” (among them several of my friends).
Macdonald does not EVER address the question how one could have installed a ceasefire during the last stages of the war with only one side adhering to this proposal? There is a monumental absence of pragmatism in his insistence on a ceasefire without attention to specifics, a shortcoming that I consider appalling. That is why I have depicted the AI programme as akin to that of witch-doctors chanting a “mantra.” That is why he can be placed among several other spokespersons and agencies in a box, that is, a category, that I have described elsewhere as “Ethereal Space.”
A critical shortcoming in this AI programme was its failure to read the context and its mind-boggling misreading of the LTTE despite previous experiences of negotiations abrogated, with one instance in April 1995 during the Kumaratunga dispensation replicating the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in minute-scale and matching the Japanese in Machiavellian duplicity.
As if previous instances of broken promises were not enough, in 2009 itself the various human right agencies clamouring for ceasefire and peace were provided with a classic example when the GoSL declared a ceasefire (implicitly short-term?) in late January 2009. The result has been described in detail by a military analyst in Australia:
“Commencing from February 1-4, the LTTE launched major counter attacks against Task Force 4 and the 59th Division … and forced the SLA to retreat as far south as Oddusudan, some 10 kilometres away.… In the initial attack the LTTE used several Vehicle-borne Improvised Explosive Devices (VBIEDs) to breach SLA defences followed by frontal counterattacks with over 500 guerrillas using a captured T-55 Main Battle Tank and a T- 85 Armoured Personnel Carrier (later knocked out by infantry). The LTTE made immediate territorial gains forcing Task Force 4 and the 59th Division to hastily fallback on their flanks between 1.5-3 kilometres. It took four days of heavy fighting to reduce the LTTE salient with reserves from the Air Mobile Brigade, Commando Regiment and the Special Forces Regiment.”
In brief, the ceasefire cost the SL army casualties that may not have otherwise occurred.
Central to any such comprehension of Eelam War IV and its prospects of resolution through negotiation was an understanding of its leader, the talaivar Velupillai Pirapāharan, something AI resolutely refused to undertake. Macdonald should now read some of the insightful observations recorded by Ben Bavinck in conversation with Rajan Hoole and Daya Somasundaram of the UTHR in the depths of the north in the years 1987 to 1991. Here were men who were wholly conversant with Tamil culture and had first-hand experience of LTTE rule.
Take these two diary entries together:
5 January 1989 in Jaffna [paraphrasing conversation with Rajan Hoole]: “Will the LTTE ever be able to participate with others in searching for a solution? But this was impossible, because Prabhakaran would rather commit suicide than compromise. That this will cost thousands of lives doesn’t matter to him.” (page 50).
21 May 1991 in Jaffna [when news of Rajiv Gandhi being assassinated reached the place]: “My friend thought that the involvement of the Tigers in this murder seemed very logical, taking into account the psychological condition of their leader, Prabhakaran, who is prone to avenge every disdainful or disparaging word or action against him. That’s why Rajani. That’s why so many others. That’s why now Rajiv had to pay the price” (page 181).
While this source was not available to Amnesty International in 2009, there were plenty of dissident Tamils and other sources, in Sri Lanka, USA and UK, who had considerable experience of the LTTE and could have been consulted before AI stepped out so boldly to pontificate on the desirable course during Sri Lanka’s warring moment in early 2009.
Here, then, is a classic case of morally-inspired people without nationality speaking for humanity from a universalist position and in a simpleton manner that is far removed from the practicalities of specific contexts. Albeit in somewhat different vein, Macdonald’s arguments have some similarities with those peddled by Gordon Weiss. This is another instance of morality and secular fundamentalism losing touch with specificity in the course of their quest for universal good.
 Among those who were clearly ultra-Tamil were Vanni, Mawatha Silva, Alfonso and Gadin Ran; while Avichara and Jim Pappa represented Sinhala bloggers.
 http://blog.amnestyusa.org/iar/sri-lanka-international-investigation-still-needed/. A discerning reader may find some of Macdonald’s responses to Mango quite evasive. This could also be wooliness arising from an unrealistic reading of the Sri Lankan situation in historical depth – which is the crux of my criticism.
. I was in Sri Lanka in May-June 20009 and it was patent to me that the Government would NOT hold the IDPs indefinitely because that was far too expensive and quite counter-productive. I am critical of the government for not easing entry and exit from these detention centres earlier than 1 December 2009 and for the way they handled the media on this issue. The human rights lobby and UTHR personnel objected to the principle of detention as an infringement of rights and as “extra-legal.” It certainly was extra-legal, but so too was the war and the warring context. To focus solely on the rights of the IDPs and to simply shunt out of mind the rest of the population seems quite one-sided. They too had rights of protection. Given the past history of suicide bombing and LTTE organisational capacities, the government was ultra-cautious in protecting (a) itself and (b) the other people of Lanka. I myself thought the LTTE was done for locally, but I would have been hard pressed to convince government personnel on this point.
 The Frontline editorial entitled it “Realities of War.” See Vol. 26/10, 9-22 May 2009, pp. 14-20. See http://www.hindu.com/fline/fl2610/stories/20090522261001600.htm.
 Sergei De Silva-Ranasinghe,” The Battle for the Vanni Pocket,” Asia-Pacific Defence Reporter, March 2009, Vol. 35/2, pp.p.18.
 Note that one of this brave little group, Rajani Thiranagama, was murdered by the LTTE in September 1989 – in fact in between the two selections I have extracted from Ben Bavinck, Of Tamils and Tigers. A Journey through the War Years,Colombo, Vijitha Yapa Publications, 2011, ISBN 978-0-95664 11-1-3.
55 responses to “Amnesty International reveals its Flawed Tunnel-Vision on Sri Lanka in 2009”
Pingback: Visual Evidence II: Torture Images on Channel 4 … and Weiss « Colombo Telegraph
Pingback: The Torture Scene In “Killing Fields” and Gordon Weiss | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Victor Rajakulendran’s Tirade at the Exposure of Pirapaharan’s Admiration for Hitler | Thuppahi's Blog
Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It’s always useful to read through articles from other authors and use a little something from other web sites.
http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2012/02/05/pawns-of-peace-evaluation-and-lessons-unlearnt/Tsunami hit Killinochi
where you find Mahinda Weerasinghe’s report. he specifically informs:
“on 25th of Dec. 2004 and we find this Press Releases In January 2005 Statement of Dr. Subramanian Swamy, Janata Party President made In Chennai onJanuary 6, 2005.
He informs that ‘The true nature of the LTTE has also been exposed in the wake of the Tsunami disaster. It’s Chief, V. Prabhakaran, has not come out of his underground bunker despite over 10,000 deaths in the Mullaitheevu area alone.’
Now, I have a lot of respect Dr. Subramanian Swamy, but he has suspended his logical thinking in this case. How can Prabhakaran survive in an underground bunker when the whole area was inundated with water?
So the real question is; was he in Mullaitheevu at all? In fact, was he inSri Lankawhen Tsunami hit Killinochi on 25th of Dec. 2004?
It seems none has done their homework post Tsunami rationally.
The Lankans were waiting for the announcement of this mass murder’s death with baited breath.
According to some private intelligence that I am sitting with, when Tsunami hit Mullaithu, Prabhakaran was in Oslo, spending his X charismas with Westborg and other Christian conspirators.
Further ‘The Island’ had reported that, an expensive coffin “for a top LTTE leader” had been smuggled into a northern Tiger area inside a container carrying relief for tsunami survivors.
Indeed UD needed the time to get him back to Mullaithu incognito or Christian conspirators will be exposed in Norway. And in order to smuggle him back they needed at least 3 weeks. Accordingly they drew up a game plan. LTTE bought an expensive coffin from Colombo and acted as if they were going to bury an important LTTE member. They never told who this important person was, and it is still a secret who was that person? Everybody assumed that it was Prabhakaran. Indeed a red herring had been conjured up by Prabhakaran to divert Lankan’s attention, and keep them suspended in limbo, so they wouldn’t trigger an investigation.
Then the media reported that ‘LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran yesterday (22nd January 2005) ended four weeks of speculation about his whereabouts by surfacing to meet a Norwegian delegation led by Foreign Minister Jan Petersen.’
Sadly Petersen was exploited as a patsy again. He must have been amazed when he met the murderer of Gandhi in Toto. Here too Bondevik has stepped out to do the great chimera on the Sinhalese and Norwegians alike, thus saving the facilitator’s bacon.”
What we like to know is; what Mahinda Weerasinghe says is based on fact or is it his imagination.
A fact finder
Pingback: Blackmail During The Endgame In Eelam War IV | Colombo Telegraph
Pingback: Blackmail during the Endgame in Eelam War IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: BBC-Blind: Misreading the Tamil Tiger Strategy of International Blackmail, 2008-13 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Witnesses To “The War Without Witnesses” | Colombo Telegraph
Pingback: Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Dedicated Medical Work amidst the Heat of War, Death and Propaganda: In the Vanni Pocket, 2009 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Fashioning a Spectre of Disaster with Aid from Humanitarian Agencies: Tamil Marvels | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Revisiting Eelam War IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Triuth Journalism? Marie Colvin hoist on her own Petard | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Marie Colvin an example of how people end up supporting terrorists and campaigning for terrorists | TERRORIST NADAGAM
Pingback: Lavish Five-Star picture of Sri Lanka as Travel Destination in traveller.com | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: No Groundwork, No Critical Thinking. A Dilettante Thinker’s Foray into Sri Lanka | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Righteous Blindness. In Cricket and In War | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Saving Talaivar Pirapāharan | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Meeting Ex-Tigers and Addressing the Issue of Rehabilitation | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: A Puzzle: When Weiss, Amnesty International and Aussie Greens LIE | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: David Miliband’s Imperious Intervention in Lanka left in Tatters | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Missing in Lanka: An Old Bibliography … Further Supplemented | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Defeating the LTTE: Major-General Kamal Gunaratne in Riveting Q and A | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Thoughts on de Silva-Ranasinghe’s Concise Delineation of the LTTE Defeat in Eelam War IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Moving to War: Critical Events that hardened Mahinda Rajapaksa’s Resolve in 2006 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Past in the Present: Deciphering the Cosmological Threads in Sri Lankan Politics | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Manipulative Distortions & Duplicity in ABC Programme on Nauru Detention Centres | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: HRW in Syria and Sri Lanka: Moral Fervour generating Political Blindness and Partisanship | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: That wicked ball! THE CHINAMAN!!! The Racist Origins of a Technical Term | Critiquing Cricket
Pingback: The Games that the Allmighty Play: Syria Now, Sri Lanka Then | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: A Down-to-Earth Review of E-War IV and Its Literature | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Death Toll in 2009: Deceit and Myopia, International and Lankan | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: A Drama in Four Acts: Dishonest Reportage by Amnesty International and Aussie Journalists remains Unmasked | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Revisiting Jaffna and the LTTE in mid-1999 guided by Mark Corcoran and the ABC | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Misreading and Distorting the Sri Lankan War, 2009-2012 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Baron Naseby and the Merry-Go-Round on Sri Lankan Politics, 1975-2017 | Thuppahi's Blog
Very interesting reading and well presented the truth is black the world opinion of the UN and AI is white it’s called global politics for advantage to oust leaders and replace them with those who favor
Pingback: The ICC is Imbecile: Verbal Assaults permitted within Cricket Field | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Is Sri Lanka creating A Dungeon for Itself? | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Liddle’s Sarcastic Criticism of David Cameron’s Arrogance in Sri Lanka at its CHOGM Occasion in 2013 M | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Infantry Warfare and the Final Phase of Eelam War IV: Where Laymen Blunder into Infantile Assessments | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Infantry Warfare and the Final Phase of Eelam War IV: Where Laymen Blunder into Infantile Assessments | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Accusers Accused — by Lord Michael Naseby | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Fundamental Issues – A Readiness to Rethink Conflict Situations. Padraig Colman Stands up | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Fervent Faces as Signs of Extremism and Deceit? From Lakemba to Lanka | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Prejudiced and Infantile Readings of Sri Lanka at Chatham House in 2019 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: A Bibliography from TAMIL PERSON and STATE | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Sri Lanka, 2010-2019: Positive Changes but Sinhala Buddhist Dominance still prevails — Alan Keenan | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Many Strands of Extremism TODAY: Salafi, Racial, Chauvinist and HR | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Many Strands of Extremism TODAY: Salafi, Racial, Chauvinist and HR - TheVoice.lk
Pingback: USA’s Imperialist Advances by Stealth? Goodness Gracious Me! | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: FOR Sri Lanka: Engaging Lord Naseby and His Journeys in Sri Lanka | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Embracing the LTTE Strategy in 2008/09: Norway, USA, UK, France and the Human Rights Conglomerate as Complicit Tiger Allies | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Learning from Lord Naseby’s Passages within Sri Lanka | Thuppahi's Blog