LISTEN & SEE https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=568469333253317&video_source=pages_finch_main_video
My message to Sri Lankan Youth, Beautiful day with Sri Lanka Unites, 6 December 2014 Continue reading
Mick Moore, 4 January 2015
I share with Razeen Sally the hope that Maithripala Sirisena will win the forthcoming presidential election. Like Sally – and a good chunk of the Lankan electorate – I have a strong distaste for corrupt, exclusionary, authoritarian rule. I also agree with Sally that a victory for Sirisena would be, at best, only the beginning of a long process of re-establishing stable, inclusive democratic rule. The obstacles to success are deep-rooted and formidable. But Sally’s advice – that a future non-Rajapakse government should put emphasis a combination of a pro-Western (and pro-Indian) foreign policy and a more market-oriented economic policy – is unlikely to be helpful. It is not that these things would be inherently wrong. Small doses of them might actually be useful. But they are either infeasible (foreign policy) or miss the point (economic policy). In broad terms, his is the same advice that ‘the West’ has been giving Sri Lankan governments since Independence over half a century ago. It remains largely unpalatable. In the current‘Asian century’, it is often impractical or irrelevant. And it also has a poor track record.
Filed under accountability, authoritarian regimes, communal relations, historical interpretation, island economy, modernity & modernization, politIcal discourse, power politics, press freedom & censorship, propaganda, Rajapaksa regime, security, Tamil civilians, the imaginary and the real, tolerance, transport and communications, truth as casualty of war, welfare & philanthophy, working class conditions, World Bank, world events & processes, zealotry
Sisira Jayasuriya, 22 December 2014
Dear Michael, I am with Razeen on this – on the pessimistic side. The boom in SL is temporary, based on a credit bubble and a public sector investment boom that is very wasteful and linked to policies that undermine the long term viability of Sri Lanka’s international competitiveness in global markets, hence unsustainable in the long term, particularly in the context of the current global situation. That said, a a further boost to stock prices etc following a likely strong Rajapakse victory in the election is quite possible, and Chinese funds can extend the boom. But it will only mean that the inevitable bust, when it comes, will be bigger.
In haste. Best for Christmas and new Year! Sisira
Gerald Peiris, 18 and 20 December 2014
Michael,
This is unadulterated ‘Common Opposition’ propaganda and wishful thinking.
My prognosis is that things are proceeding much better for MR than initially expected, and he will win with a comfortable, (but smaller than in 2010) margin. It is the hotchpotch of parties behind the Maithreepala nomination that is disintegrating. Moreover, while the Joint Opposition has been able to buy a few high profile defectors from the MR camp, there are numerically large defections of the local government politicians from parties of the JO to the government side. They are the people who really understand their own grass-root situations. Even the SLMC which was expected to join the JO is now having second thoughts, a large segment of its politburo wanting to remain in the ranks of the government. (Their leader Rauf Hakim has a record of being thoroughly unreliable, but has always displayed a good understanding of what is good for him.). The JO will undoubtedly stage a massive campaign, with the funds it gets from some of the US-led embassies. But the government also has funds and other resources to match. Some highly damaging disclosures are also been made by Attanayake, the former General Secy. of the UNP, against key leaders of the JO like Ranil, Mangala and Chandrika .…..
Best regards, Gerry Continue reading
Michael Roberts
Razeen Sally is an acquaintance and a reputed scholar attached to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore. When I spotted his review of the Sri Lankan economy and its political setting in the prestigious Wall Street Journal in mid-December, I immediately inserted it in THUPPAHI with a feisty title of my own coinage. This was in part because I had reservations about some of his evaluations. These thoughts arose in part from some of the economic indicators emphasised by one Jon Springer of the prestigious Forbes agency in USA.
In part my queries arose from my readings of the political economy of Sri Lanka in spatio-economic terms on the basis of my historical and political researches. Several themes associated with this peculiar respective had already been presented in my review of the issues surrounding the construction of a cricket stadium at Sooriyawewa as one pillar in the Rajapaksa family’s “cultivation” of their “home garden,” viz., Hambantota District — an essay that had earned me a reprimand (private email) from a good friend in Jayantha Dhanapala and attracted sarcastic comments in transcurrents. Continue reading
Filed under accountability, centre-periphery relations, economic processes, elephant tales, governance, growth pole, historical interpretation, island economy, modernity & modernization, politIcal discourse, power politics, Rajapaksa regime, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, slanted reportage, sri lankan society, the imaginary and the real, transport and communications, truth as casualty of war, welfare & philanthophy, world events & processes
About Chitrasena and His Heritage
As a teenager, Chitrasena, the founder of the Dance Co, was inspired by the visit of Rabindranath Tagore’s Indian dance troupe to Sri Lanka in 1934. Tagore stressed the need for a people to discover their own culture to be able to assimilate the best of other cultures. At his father’s insistence, Chitrasena first spent over six years in a Sri Lankan village studying the Kohomba Kankariya dance ritual under one of the great masters. Continue reading
Filed under cultural transmission, performance, unusual people