Category Archives: governance

After 19A: The Political Scene Today and its Swirling Waters

:Dayan Jayatilleka, in The Island, 2 May 2015

sri-lanka-parliament-flooded-nov-2010There was a struggle against the model of 19A first presented by Ranil Wickremesinghe, but there was no struggle against 19A as such—by which I mean the idea that the executive presidency required downward readjustment. The UNP-CBK-TNA-JVP Quartet had envisaged decapitation of the Executive presidency while the masses, the SLFP-UPFA and JHU envisaged trimming; downward revision.Thus, there was no struggle against 19A; there was a struggle over 19A; its scale and scope. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under constitutional amendments, democratic measures, governance, historical interpretation, politIcal discourse, power politics, power sharing, Presidential elections, Rajapaksa regime, security, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society, the imaginary and the real, TNA, world affairs

Rajan and Jehan on the Present Government: Issues and Strengths

Rajan Philips in Sunday Island, 25 April 2015, two days before the vote on the 19th Amendment and where his  title is “The 100-Day Question: Will President Sirisena dissolve parliament and call the Rajapaksa bluff?”

 M SIRISENA WAVES If there is ever a time for political leadership to act in disregard of consensus, it is now. There was a time in Sri Lankan politics when that master rhetorician Colvin R. de Silva presaged the governing style of the SLFP-LSSP-CP United Front as one that would be “characterized not by consensus but by leadership.” Dr. Colvin’s foretelling was in anticipation of the massive United Front election victory in 1970. It turned out to be ill-advised at that time. But it is thoroughly appropriate at the present time. In politics, consensus is the preferred means to a desired end, but it is not an end itself. President Sirisena has the power to act and dissolve parliament and let the people elect a new parliament to end the current political uncertainty in parliament and in the country. Will he do it? That is the 100-Day question. And there will not be much else to talk about the 100 Days if parliament does not pass the 19th Amendment on Tuesday, the day after tomorrow. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, authoritarian regimes, constitutional amendments, governance, historical interpretation, legal issues, life stories, politIcal discourse, power politics, power sharing, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society

The Passage of the Amended 19A has 4 Winners and Two Losers, says Dayan

DAYAN J in mountainsDayan Jayatilleka, in The Island, 30 April 2015 , where the title runs “19A Minus: A Middle Path”

There were four main winners in the battle over 19A. Of them, the second biggest winner was President Sirisena who was able to retain much of his power while balancing adroitly between the two contending components of his power base: his ally the UNP and his party the SLFP. The biggest winner however, was not President Sirisena. It was a dead man, President Junius Richard Jayewardene. His 1978 Constitution proved so robust a structure, that it successfully resisted the joint attempt of his distant nephew Ranil Wickremesinghe and his old rival Sirimavo Bandaranaike’s daughter Chandrika Kumaratunga to upend its center-piece, the executive presidency. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under accountability, authoritarian regimes, centre-periphery relations, constitutional amendments, governance, historical interpretation, Indian Ocean politics, Left politics, life stories, nationalism, politIcal discourse, power politics, power sharing, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society

Dayan nails Sampanthan and TNA unto Separatist Cross

Dayan Jayatilleka, courtesy of The Island, 5 April 2015, where the title reads ““Last nail in the coffin”

We have already had a bitter experience with Mr. Wigneswaran and we mustn’t repeat or compound it. Mr. Sampanthan is a cultured gentleman, a superb speaker and fine parliamentarian in the old tradition. But he would be most unsuitable to be made Leader of the Opposition. It is neither because he is an ethnic Tamil nor because he is the leader of the TNA that Mr. Sampanthan must not be appointed the Leader of the Opposition of the Sri Lankan parliament. It is because of the political project he subscribes to and the political views he holds. Going by those declared views, he would, as Opposition Leader, not oppose only the policies and practices of the Government of Sri Lanka. Indeed he probably won’t oppose the present Government at all, since he helped bring it into office; his party colleague Mr. Sumanthiran is a co-drafter of the 19th amendment which castrates the executive Presidency, turning that office into a constitutional eunuch; and his party the TNA has gone on to defend the 19th amendment in the Supreme Court. Instead, Mr. Sampanthan as Opposition Leader would be opposed to the very political community, the very political unit, which he would be sworn to uphold and operate squarely within. TNA leaders -island

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under accountability, authoritarian regimes, centre-periphery relations, governance, historical interpretation, life stories, NGOs, politIcal discourse, power politics, prabhakaran, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society, the imaginary and the real, TNA, world events & processes, zealotry

Jayampathy’s Q and A on Supreme Court Decision on 19A

Exclusive interview with Dr. Jayampathy Wickramaratne, President’s Counsel and member of the Government’s constitution drafting team … courtesy of The Island, 16 April 2015

JAYAMPATHY

In your view, what are the main points of interest in the Supreme Court’s decision on the 19th Amendment Bill? For some time, various views have been expressed regarding the extent to which the executive power of the President can be restricted without having a referendum. Article 3 of the Constitution states that ‘sovereignty is in the people and is inalienable. Sovereignty includes the powers of government, fundamental rights and the franchise.’ Art. 4 (b), which is the provision relevant to us, says that ‘the executive power of the People including the defence of Sri Lanka, shall be exercised by the President of the Republic elected by the People.’ Art. 3 is in the list of provisions that require referendum but not Art. 4. In the Thirteenth Amendment case, a decision of a Full Bench, CJ Sharavananda stated for the majority that Article 3 would be violated only if there is a ‘prejudicial impact’ on the sovereignty of the People. But in 2002, in the earlier 19th Amendment case, the Court presided over by CJ Sarath Silva held that Article 4 must be read with Article 3 and this was interpreted by many to mean that every violation of Article 4 would require a referendum. In the present case, the Court used the phrase, ‘prejudicial impact’ and made it clear that ‘not all violations of Article 4 will necessarily result in a violation of Article 3.’ Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under constitutional amendments, democratic measures, governance, historical interpretation, politIcal discourse, power politics, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society

Emotional Turmoil and Rumour-Mongering: World Cup Defeats, Pogroms & Elections

Michael Roberts

Though hardly surprising,** Sri Lanka’s ignominious exit from the World Cup in ODI cricket this year has inspired some ridiculous criticisms of team selections from cricket enthusiasts who have not evaluated the difficulties posed by a series of unfortunate injuries or the questionable alternatives facing the Selectors in every instance of player position/selection. Such waves of criticism are not uncommon from fans of particular sides in many parts of the world. However, the Sri Lankan story this time round is reminiscent of the malicious rumours swirling around the World Cup selections before and after the final match at Mumbai in the World Cup 2011 (some concocted by Rajapaksa-haters and/or opponents). It is therefore appropriate that I reproduce the essay*** that I penned on that occasion and place it within a political space — not least because it dwells on the horrendous crimes inflicted in 1915, 1958 and 1983 upon minority communities who were Sri Lankan through and through. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under accountability, authoritarian regimes, British colonialism, communal relations, cultural transmission, disparagement, doctoring evidence, governance, historical interpretation, landscape wondrous, life stories, Muslims in Lanka, patriotism, politIcal discourse, power politics, Presidential elections, propaganda, Rajapaksa regime, riots and pogroms, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, slanted reportage, sri lankan society, the imaginary and the real, truth as casualty of war, vengeance, violence of language

Quaint Tit-Bits about Colombo & Environs in Dutch Times

Courtesy of Asoka Kuruppu

Do you know the best residential area in Colombo during the Dutch times?  Yes it was ‘Grandpass’ :  (from Grande Passo) Some old Dutch houses and even a Dispensary are still there.

Other interesting names that still survive from those days:

Main Street: (Roa Direto).   The Dutch remembered one of their governors – Hulft who died during the siege of Colombo, with Hulftsdorp and recalled some of their native place names like Leydenand Delft.   The Dutch named

Maliban Street to identify the fashionable promenade in Pettah – Maliban meaning the Mmall.   Kayman’s Gate refers to ‘kayman’ – crocodiles that were found in the area where the rivulet entered the sea.   Wolvendaal meant the dale of wolves.   Bloemendahl is a vale of flowers.

Korteboam means short trees.   Beira (mythology), the mother to all the gods and goddesses in the Celtic mythology of Scotland.   There was a time when Kollupitiya was known as Baradeniya. It was a beautiful rustic village with coconut gardens and cinnamon trees that grew wild and narrow cart-tracks which connected the few villas and homes here with the rest of the country.  For the purpose of postal services `Colombo 03’ consists of Kollupitiya.

Continue reading

4 Comments

Filed under governance, heritage, historical interpretation, life stories, sri lankan society, world affairs

The New Government’s Vendettas & Misguided Measures are Squandering Sri Lanka’s Future Prospects

NEIL KARUNeil Karunaratne, courtesy of the Daily Mirror, 30 March 2015, where the title is “Holding Back Development.” 

Ex-president Mahinda Rajapaksa in a message read in a political rally held in Ratnapura, last week alleged that the current administration has stalled
development in the country. I cannot help, but agree, though grudgingly. This government has held back the country’s development. That is already
reflected in the projected growth numbers: The Asian Development Bank now says that the country’s economic growth would dip to 7 per cent this year,
from 7.4 per cent, last year. As recently as two months back, the ADB projected 8 per cent growth for 2015 and 2016. It however assures that the economy would rebound in 2016 to 7.4 per cent, still short of previous estimates. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under economic processes, governance, historical interpretation, Indian Ocean politics, modernity & modernization, performance, politIcal discourse, power politics, suicide bombing, transport and communications, truth as casualty of war, world affairs

Creeping Self–Determination? Tamil Extremism gets a Boost from Modi

Izeth Hussain, courtesy of The Island, 28 March 2015, where the title reads “Wiggie’s Thunderbolt and 13A- not + as solution”

Modi + Sirisena  This article is really in continuation of my article, “After the Modi visit,” which appeared in The Island of March 21. That article was written hurriedly while I was still convalescent and in a state of alarm. Since then I have had time to consider some important feedbacks that I have received and to study in detail an important policy statement of Prime Minister Modi. I have come to two firm conclusions. One is that seen in the perspective of promoting a political solution to the Tamil ethnic problem the Modi visit was a total unmitigated disaster. Wittingly or otherwise it strengthened the hands of the Tamil racists who have been working, stealthily and steadfastly, towards Eelam or a confederal arrangement close to it. My other firm conclusion is that Sri Lanka can come through unscathed only by occupying the moral high ground. In concrete terms that can best be done by implementing 13A minus – that is 13A without police and land powers. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under centre-periphery relations, governance, Indian Ocean politics, life stories, politIcal discourse, power politics, power sharing, reconciliation, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, world events & processes

Charles Sarvan’s Essays in Sri Lanka : A Paradise Lost?

cvr_1 -Charles

“This modest collection is dedicated to those few Sri Lankans, women and men, who have publicly and persistently stood up for values which would make the county a truly ‘beautiful’ island: a happier place for all, irrespective of ethnic group, religion, sex or class. (I mean attributes such as freedom and justice, decency and equality: sama samaja).  In different ways and in different degree, they have paid a price.” ……..ISBN 978-93-84129-59-0

Publisher: CinnamonTeal Publishing, Goa, India ………………Email: contactus@cinnamonteal.in

II. ‘Race’ versus religion: sharing some thoughts ….. A fresh essay by Charles Sarvan

One of my sons took me to see the Martin Luther King film, ‘Selma’, which opens with 15 September 1963 and the explosion at an African-American Baptist church in Birmingham, Alabama, killing four children. The scene reminded me of the poem ‘Ballad of Birmingham’, published in 1968 by African American Dudley Randall (1914-2000): “Mother dear, may I go downtown        Instead of out to play, And march the streets of Birmingham In a Freedom March today?” “No, baby, no, you may not go, For the dogs are fierce and wild, And clubs and hoses, guns and jails Aren’t good for a little child.” “But, mother, I won’t be alone. Other children will go with me, And march the streets of Birmingham To make our country free.” “No baby, no, you may not go For I fear those guns will fire. But you may go to church instead And sing in the children’s choir.” She has combed and brushed her night-dark hair, And bathed rose petal sweet, And drawn white gloves on her small brown hands, And white shoes on her feet. The mother smiled to know that her child Was in the sacred place, But that smile was the last smile To come upon her face.  Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under atrocities, communal relations, cultural transmission, discrimination, governance, heritage, legal issues, life stories, politIcal discourse, riots and pogroms, sri lankan society, vengeance, world events & processes, zealotry