Unbuddhist Interventions; A Critique

Usvatte-aratchi in https://island.lk/why-so-unbuddhist/…. 24 February 2o26

Hardly a week goes by, when someone in this country does not preach to us about the great, long lasting and noble nature of the culture of the Sinhala Buddhist people. Some Sundays, it is a Catholic priest that sings the virtues of Buddhist culture. Some eminent university professor, not necessarily Buddhist, almost weekly in this newspaper, extols the superiority of Buddhist values in our society. Some 70 percent of the population in this society, at Census, claim that they are Buddhist in religion. They are all capped by that loud statement in dhammacakka pavattana sutta, commonly believed to have been spoken by the Buddha to his five colleagues, when all of them were seeking release from unsatisfactory state of being:

‘….jati pi dukkha jara pi dukkha maranam pi dukkham yam pi…. sankittena…. ‘

If birth (‘jati’) is a matter of sorrow, why celebrate birth? Not just about 2,600 years ago but today, in distant port city Colombo? Why gaba perahara to celebrate conception? Why do bhikkhu, most prominent in this community, celebrate their 75th birthday on a grand scale? A commentator reported that the Buddha said (…ayam antima jati natthi idani punabbhavo – this is my last birth and there shall be no rebirth). They should rather contemplate on jati pi dukkha and anicca (subject to change) and seek nibbana, as they invariably admonish their listeners (savaka) to do several times a week. (Incidentally, Buddhists acquire knowledge by listening to bhanaka. Hence savaka and bhanaka.) The incongruity of bhikkhu who preach jati pi duklkha and then go to celebrate their 65th birthday is thunderous.

For all this, we are one of the most violent societies in the world: during the first 15 days of this year (2026), there has been more one murder a day, and just yesterday (13 February) a youngish lawyer and his wife were gunned down as they shopped in the neighbourhood of the Headquarters of the army. In 2022, the government of this country declared to the rest of the world that it could not pay back debt it owed to the rest of the world, mostly because those that governed us plundered the wealth of the governed. For more than two decades now, it has been a public secret that politicians, bureaucrats, policemen and school teachers, in varying degrees of culpability, plunder the wealth of people in this country. We have that information on the authority of a former President of the Republic. Politicians who held the highest level of responsibility in government, all Buddhist, not only plundered the wealth of its citizens but also transferred that wealth overseas for exclusive use by themselves and their progeny and the temporary use of the host nation. So much for the admonition, ‘raja bhavatu dhammiko’ (may the king-rulers- be righteous). It is not uncommon for politicians anywhere to lie occasionally but ours speak the truth only more parsimoniously than they spend the wealth they plundered from the public. The language spoken in parliament is so foul (parusa vaca) that galleries are closed to the public lest school children adopt that ‘unparliamentary’ language, ironically spoken in parliament. If someone parses the spoken and written word in our society, there is every likelihood that he would find that rumour (pisuna vaca) is the currency of the realm. Radio, television and electronic media have only created massive markets for lies (musa vada), rumour (pisuna vaca), foul language (parusa vaca) and idle chatter (samppampalapa). To assure yourself that this is true, listen, if you can bear with it, newscasts on television, sit in the gallery of Parliament or even read some latterday novels. There generally was much beauty in what Wickremasinghe, Munidasa, Tennakone, G. B. Senanayake, Sarachchandra and Amarasekara wrote. All that beauty has been buried with them. A vile pidgin thrives.

Although the fatuous chatter of politicians about financial and educational hubs in this country have wafted away leaving a foul smell, it has not taken long for this society to graduate into a narcotics hub. In 1975, there was the occasional ganja user and he was a marginal figure who in the evenings, faded into the dusk. Fifty years later, narcotics users are kingpins of crime, financiers and close friends of leading politicians and otherwise shakers and movers. Distilleries are among the most profitable enterprises and leading tax payers and defaulters in the country (Tax default 8 billion rupees as of 2026). There was at least one distillery owner who was a leading politician and a powerful minister in a long ruling government. Politicians in public office recruited and maintained the loyalty to the party by issuing recruits lucrative bar licences. Alcoholic drinks (sura pana) are a libation offered freely to gods that hold sway over voters. There are innuendos that strong men, not wholly lay, are not immune from seeking pleasures in alcohol. It is well known that many celibate religious leaders wallow in comfort on intricately carved ebony or satin wood furniture, on uccasayana, mahasayana, wearing robes made of comforting silk. They do not quite observe the precept to avoid seeking excessive pleasures (kamasukhallikanuyogo). These simple rules of ethical behaviour laid down in panca sila are so commonly denied in the everyday life of Buddhists in this country, that one wonders what guides them in that arduous journey, in samsara. I heard on TV a senior bhikkhu say that bhikkhu sangha strives to raise persons disciplined by panca sila. Evidently, they have failed.

So, it transpires that there is one Buddhism in the books and another in practice. Inquiries into the Buddhist writings are mainly the work of historians and into religion in practice, the work of sociologists and anthropologists. Many books have been written and many, many more speeches (bana) delivered on the religion in the books. However, very, very little is known about the religion daily practised. Yes, there are a few books and papers written in English by cultural anthropologists. Perhaps we know more about yakku natanava, yakun natanava than we know about Buddhism is practised in this country. There was an event in Colombo where some archaeological findings, identified as dhatu (relics), were exhibited. Festivals of that nature and on a grander scale are a monthly regular feature of popular Buddhism. How do they fit in with the religion in the books? Or does that not matter? Never the twain shall meet.

by Usvatte-aratchi

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “Unbuddhist Interventions; A Critique

  1. Abraham Nymos

    Dr. U-A (Usvatta-Arachchi) is an economist who knows how organized religion has been commodified for centuries, and more explicitly especially after people like Milton Friedman who declared that “Markets know best”. They also have their own morality. Buddhism was commodified in Sri Lanka rather recently, after JRJ’s free-market. Christianity and most other religions were commodified long ago, and Bishops, Cardinals, Popes have lived in king-like pomp and pleasure since Rome embraced Chritianity. The gap between the early Christian peasants in Jerusalem and the wealthy evangelicals or even our own Cardinals is enormous. In HInduism, the Kovils in Indias, ir in Bambalapitiya, Jaffna, and in Toronto etc., are also extremely wealthy and hold poojas, festivals and feasts that would shock ascetic Brahamins like Alara, Kalama or even Vivekananda. Diaspora Kovils have supported Sikh as well as LTTE terrorism, casteism and anti-feminism. But it is much more fashionable in certain circles in Sri Lanka to target Buddhism and Buddhists, and point to the difference between the Teaching of the Buddha and that of the local practice, or that although we hear bana all the time with NO Effect, we live in a violent country (what do you expect after a 30-year war where “robber barons” were encouraged and a governor of the central bank is absconding?). What is the message? Dr. U-A knows it it not just Buddhist sermons that are not effective, but all religions trying to make people good have had No effect . But when they teach people to become vicious in the name of religion, it has powerful effect, with people even being burnt at the stake as recently as 1860 by Christian activists, and more recently by Jihadists and Hindutha Thugs. Are all these religious practices and preaching facets of hypocrisy? Sure – but it is going on because it is profitable Business! Why doesn’t the good Doctor of Economics review the economic forces that are keeping all this alive, not just within Buddhism, but in much more lucrative religious forces extending from the evangelical West to Israel and the Arab Emirates to Hinduthva India and so on back to highly evangelized South Korea? So, Is Dr U-A is just following the trendy populist approach of attacking “Sinhala Buddhism” as a passport for adhering to the Colombo cultural set that is well exemplified by the holier-than-thou people of Kurunduwatte Kalusuddas? Instead of writing a sermon about Buddhist sermons not being effective, I urge U-A to devise a good means of taxing religious activity to fund state coffers. That is, Axe the tax-free status of religious institutions.
    by Abraham Nymos.

  2. Ivan Amarasinghe

    K8https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Gbm4mNLBh/

  3. Ivan Amarasinghe

    Sacrificial devotion? https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Gbm4mNLBh/

Leave a Reply