Fundamental Failures in State Formation in Sri Lanka

The ABSTRACT of a refereed article in the Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 6 December 2020, the authos being  Malin Akebo & Sunil Bastian, whose chosen title is  “Sri Lanka: Victory, Politics, and State Formation” ….

https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620976121

In 2009, the war between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam ended through a military victory for the government. Features of the postwar peace-including persistent militarization, strengthened nationalism, and communal violence-have commonly been attributed to a failed attempt at liberal peacebuilding followed by an authoritarian backlash. In contrast, this study shows how the postwar peace has been shaped by historical processes of state formation aimed at consolidating the Sri Lankan state. The article takes a long-term approach to analysing peace in Sri Lanka through the lens of state formation. The analysis centres on four key aspects: (1) postwar security, (2) state-minority relations, (3) socioeconomic aspects, and (4) electoral politics. We conclude that there are currently few signs of any substantial state reform that would accommodate the continuous demand for social justice and minority rights that has spurred violent conflicts in Sri Lanka.

A NOTE: This essay, clearly, was written before the recent elections brought ina government headed by AKDissanayake with its JVP heritage.

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, historical interpretation, politIcal discourse, self-reflexivity, sri lankan society, world events & processes

Leave a Reply