Observer in a Black Sea Port
This You Tube item serves up an excellent discussion and critical analysis of some of the key clauses of the recent NATO communique. It is entertaining too. There is a vast gap between the intellectual rigour applied in this discussion, compared to NATO’s communique which is a distortion of reality and historical truth, and is sheer propaganda.
- NATO is a cancer that is constantly metamorphosing to consume everything good and healthy in the world, only to destroy it.
- Note the organisation’s overuse of metaphors, e.g. “a well-lit bridge.”
- The ultimate goal of NATO is to dissolve the United Nations (just as the West dissolved the League of Nations) and replace the UN with NATO asserting itself as the sole global authority. But it will divide the world into two camps – countries that surrender sovereignty to NATO, and countries choosing to forge independent sovereignty.
- NATO forces “partnerships” on to countries, makes claims that the Black Sea is their territory, and imposes the idea of all countries being “in their backyard” whether those countries accept it or not.
- What does NATO mean by China being “an enabler of Russia’s war” and how does that differ from being “a decisive enabler of Russia’s war”?
- NATO misinterprets what is meant by Russia-China’s “no limits” partnership and has no right to define how Russia and China decide on what their partnership should be.
- It is not China that is enabling the “largest war in Europe in recent history’, it is NATO and the US that are enabling the largest war in EU in recent history. NATO uses the fallacy of blaming China for something NATO is doing, not China. It’s NATO that is pouring weapons into Ukraine, not China.
- The fallacious phrase “dual use” materials could refer to anything. It is too vague to have any real meaning, but rather it is NATO’s way to try to stop genuine business ties between China and Russia.
- Under the terms of the NATO communique, importing toilet paper from China is “dual use” because toilet paper is needed by Russian troops and is enabling Russia’s “war of aggression”. Chinese toasters and refrigerators can also be defined as “dual use” items and a “decisively enabler of Russia’s war” because soldiers use this equipment to make cheese toasted sandwiches.
- Who is NATO to make any demands of China? NATO is not a member of the UN Security Council and has no legal authority to make any demands of China.
- If China ceases exporting Chinese toasters to Russia, the war would come to an end.
- How does China threaten Euro-Atlantic security? It doesn’t. NATO has expanded into the South China Sea and threatens China’s security. It’s called “mission creep” – the fallacious logic on which NATO justifies expanding into the Pacific and Africa.
******************************
AUTHOR’s AFTERTHOUGHT
Actually, the leader doesn’t matter. The US is a ship that runs itself. The leader is just a puppet to give the impression of democracy. The only thing that will arrest the US is its collapse.