Michael Roberts
Pic by Roberts
Botham & Vaughan at Mankulam –Pic by AFP
A number of British and foreign media personnel attended this event, but Rex Clementine was, as far as I could see, the only local print journalist who turned up. This was a pity because we were treated to a major initiative as well as some excellent snacks.As head of the MCC the well-known cricket writer, Christopher Martin-Jenkins started proceedings by indicating that he had recently visited the FOG community project at Seenigama where, a few years preceding, Michael Brearley had inaugurated the MCC Centre of Excellence. He was all praise for the community work that was in place at Seenigama. He said that he was very hopeful that MCC would also be directly involved in the cricketing aspects of the initiative at Mankulam. A fund-raising dinner on June 8, immediately after Sri Lanka’s Test at Lord’s, is planned as a tribute to Muttiah Muralitharan, and MCC will keep close contact with the Foundation for Goodness to ensure that the proceeds go towards a continuing MCC involvement at Mankulam.
Sir Ian Botham marked the central role of the Laureus Sports Foundation in supporting the project of creating a sports village and top-class school at Mankulam by emphasizing the central location of Mankulam, a nodal point which was twenty-thirty miles from other little towns east, west and south and not far from the populated Jaffna Peninsula. He spoke graphically of the flattened and leveled war zone around the place and remarked on the pock-marked and damaged remnants of buildings in the area. He added that he was “hugely impressed by the plans for a new sports complex site which will regenerate communities and encourage reconciliation.”
Muralitharan indicated that the rejuvenation of the war zone and restoration of the life-world of its peoples was an enormous task calling for massive expenditure. The government resources did not stretch in every direction and it was important for private initiatives to fill some of the gaps. They could not go hat in hand to those who had already chipped in to help FOG, so Kushil and he would be seeking new sources of support abroad and had already mapped out visits to USA in the near future. He emphasized that “the army was doing a great job” in assisting the people of Mankulam locality and the north in general, an assessment based on many visits to the former war zone [on top, one could add, of visits during the ceasefire period].
Muralitharan went on to stress that Sri Lanka’s cricket fans were an integral pillar of the success story of cricket in recent years. So it was the duty of cricketers to respond to the needs of supporters who face hardships. Kushil Gunasekera observed that the Mankulam venture was designed to contribute towards a reconciliation of the people of the north and those in the south.
Kumar Sangakkara contended that the Seenigama venture had transformed the locality and was a “fantastic facility.” It was now “a vibrant hub.” As such, the Mankulam project has every prospect of transforming a deprived area. It was at an accessible location and one could envision the development of a “premier sporting facility” in the near future. “We in Colombo,” he said, “were a world away from the war” and not subject to the experiences faced by people in the north and east. This venture was one step towards enabling them “to stand on their own two feet and to become vital members of Sri Lankan society.”
Michael Vaughan stressed that he had been involved in four Laureus projects and in every one of them the response of the children to their visits was uplifting: “their eyes light up.” So his vision was of a future where the Mankulam region would produce a new Sri Lankan cricketer.
These brief presentations were followed by an informative Q and A session. In one response Sangakkara contended that cricket was a uniting force. There was a widespread interest in the game. He recalled one occasion when he and Sanath had traveled from Dambulla to Trincomalee during the war period and found that at all the guard posts the soldiers and others were following one of the ongoing international matches [presumably involving a side other than Sri Lanka]. Again, during their tsunami relief work the cricketers were touched by the fact that, at so many tsunami-hit villages, individuals inquired after the welfare of Sanath Jayasuriya’s and Upul Tharanga’s families. That is, they had quickly imbibed the information that the houses and families of these two cricketers had been destroyed by that disaster. Here, then were people who had lost so much, but yet remained concerned about one of their cricketing stars. So, in his view, if the one went all the way with this Mankulam facility, it would definitely be an inspiration. “Cricket is a uniting force.”
To my mind two central facts emerged from the question-session: (A) four-five million dollars was the monetary target in view at the outset in order to consolidate the preliminary plans; and (B) Kushil, Murali and their aides were NOT intending to replicate the Seenigama community model in every aspect. Rather, the central pillar was going to be the creation of high-quality school with the whole gamut of skills required for the modern world. The sporting complex would be just one pillar in this educational focus.
To my mind this is a critical and intelligent adjustment. Near Seenigama one has excellent schools such as Dharmasoka, Mahinda, Richmond and St. Aloysius besides quite a few others that are less well known, but remain serviceable. In contrast the northern Vanni has been sparsely populated for decades and poorly serviced with vibrant schools. The war from 1983-2009, of course, sustained pathways that were not geared to educational excellence. So, the emphasis adopted by FOG is to be strongly encouraged.
To my knowledge Kushil went on a trip to USA late last year to map out a fund-gathering programme in the future with Muralitharan as the chief attraction. When I scrounged a lift from Kushil after the match against England last Saturday, I found that one of his friends in the car was a Tamil medical doctor from the Los Angeles area who was going to be one of the anchor men in the fund-raising activity in the year 2011.
To me it seems utopian for anyone to expect an international class cricketer to emerge from the Mankulam area in the immediate future (assessed as 10-15 years). As Kumar Sangakkara stressed in his keynote address at the launching of Rex Clementine’s Rags to Riches, the present strength of Sri Lankan cricket was the outcome of “heritage,” that is a long history of cricket endeavour involving the transmission of skill and character from generational cohort to following cohort. The emergence of Athula Samaraskera and Upul Chandana from Mahinda College in Galle in the 1980s derived from the inspirations and endeavours of the Amendra brothers and Dandeniya de Silva brothers, amongst others, in the 1950s and 1960s.
Cricketing development is a slow process. In contrast the emergence of local Einsteins in engineering, IT, and other modern professional fields will take less time. The founding of a well-staffed and well-supplied school at Mankulam will bear fruit quickly. Its rejuvenating capacities will be more widespread that those provided by the cricket field. But cricket and sport are fun; and, as fields of joy, a necessary adjunct to academic effort. And, as those on the podium at the Taj Samudra indicated, cricket is an arena that promotes ethnic amity and camaraderie.