A Lankan Reefcomber …. with highlighting imposed by The Editor, Thuppahi
Dr Darini Rajasingham-Senanayake’s theory of deep undercurrents linking events in Sri Lanka in 2019 and the present Middle-Eastern battles is an interesting read. [VISIT ………………………… https://thuppahis.com/2026/04/05/usas-deep-demonic-reach-embraces-sri-lanka/#more-98002 ]
To support this narrative, the analysis draws on the 2026 U.S. official admission of the torpedo strike, logistical records of the Iranian ship’s return from an Indian fleet review, and the specific targeting of Chinese research scientists in 2019. The author posits that the complexity of these operations points to a “Mastermind” hidden in plain sight, working to advance a “Greater Israel” agenda and protect the petrodollar by controlling vital sea lanes and data cable routes.
While the article is well-structured and follows a consistent logical thread, it relies heavily on speculative links and circumstantial evidence. By comparing the deaths of Chinese scientists with those of Iranian sailors, it constructs a narrative of recurring geopolitical patterns. However, the core claim—that the CIA and Mossad masterminded the 2019 attacks—is based primarily on inference. The author suggests that because these events ultimately benefited Western interests, the U.S. must be responsible—a conclusion that rests on a post hoc ergo propter hoc logical fallacy.
Ultimately, the text functions as an opinionated editorial that is effective at identifying coincidences to support a specific worldview. While it highlights provocative correlations between maritime security and economic sovereignty, it lacks the “smoking gun” evidence required to prove its most extreme claims of foreign orchestration. Nevertheless, the article has merit, and it was good of you to post it.
I tend to ignore “official” findings. I hate the word “official” because it implies something is both true and final, which is seldom the case. There are always political interests at the heart of anything claiming to be an official investigation. These investigations—including those by the FBI and Interpol—concluded that the 2019 attacks were carried out by a local ISIS group with transnational links. Western media and think tanks claim the Amaq News Agency issued a brief bulletin in Arabic stating that “the perpetrators of the attack targeting the citizens of coalition countries and Christians in Sri Lanka were Islamic State fighters.” They further allege that this initial claim was disseminated through the group’s official channels on Telegram.
ABC News and the Combatting Terrorism Center (CTC) similarly claimed that later that same day, ISIS issued a longer, formal communiqué. This statement reportedly provided specific details, specifying that the “blessed attack” had targeted Christians during their “blasphemous holiday” and listed the kunya (fighting names) of seven suicide bombers: Abu Ubaida, Abu al-Mukhtar, Abu Khalil, Abu al-Bara’a, Abu Muhammad, Abu Abdullah, and Abu Hamza.
The problem with all these sources is that we are asked to trust they possess the original primary source material, yet they never reveal it. Consequently, there is no way to independently verify any of these claims, which reinforces the idea that we are being forced to rely on “gatekeepers.” When one attempts to locate the primary source material, it either appears non-existent or cannot be found. Without this documentation, these Western narratives remain unverified, which is why I am disinclined to give them much credence.
At the time of the Easter bombings, I felt something was amiss. The FBI’s rapid intervention in a foreign jurisdiction like Sri Lanka—despite their documented history of “manufacturing” cases—should be a cause for scrutiny, not confidence. While the Sri Lankan government eventually suggested local political involvement and the FBI maintained the ISIS narrative, I do not believe the stories presented are the final chapter. I put forward my own views at the time and was dismissed. Knowing how intelligence agencies operate, one must be suspicious of their involvement. Would the FBI or any other agency tamper with evidence if it suited their national interests? You bet.
In case you didn’t click the link above here it is again: https://ctc.westpoint.edu/terrorism-teardrop-island-understanding-easter-2019-attacks-sri-lanka/